It's the violence in the rhetoric that needs to be turned down. Is there violence in your rhetoric?
I'm sure the swing voters who will decide the election want the violent rhetoric to stopo. By definition, they are not the extremes. It's the extremes who have the violent rhetoric.
It's the violence in the rhetoric that needs to be turned down. Is there violence in your rhetoric?
I'm sure the swing voters who will decide the election want the violent rhetoric to stopo. By definition, they are not the extremes. It's the extremes who have the violent rhetoric.
There's no violence in my rhetoric, but as to the swing voters, battleground polls seem to indicate that they'd prefer the violent rhetoric to the old/weak guy who whisper-talks.
It's the violence in the rhetoric that needs to be turned down. Is there violence in your rhetoric?
I'm sure the swing voters who will decide the election want the violent rhetoric to stopo. By definition, they are not the extremes. It's the extremes who have the violent rhetoric.
There's no violence in my rhetoric, but as to the swing voters, battleground polls seem to indicate that they'd prefer the violent rhetoric to the old/weak guy who whisper-talks.
OK, then you have no rhetoric to turn down.
Yes, the voters prefer strong and wrong to weak and right. Which is all the more reason for the Dems to get a strong candidate.