7 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Think you missed an important "plank" in Trump's planned agenda -- making sure "fully intact" boys aren't playing in girls' sports leagues:

"Trump and Republicans Bet Big on Anti-Trans Ads Across the Country:

Republicans have spent tens of millions of dollars on the ads, part of an attempt to help them win over suburban female voters. ....

With just four weeks until the election, Donald J. Trump and Republican candidates nationwide are putting transgender issues at the center of their campaigns, tapping into fears about transgender women and girls in sports and about taxpayer-funded gender transitions in prisons."

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/08/us/politics/trump-republican-transgender-ads.html?ogrp=dpl&unlocked_article_code=1.U04.Gl1x.aR4PHluTn1IP&smid=url-share

For all the rot on the Republican side, at least they're not castrating and sterilizing autistic and dysphoric children:

"Why Is the U.S. Still Pretending We Know Gender-Affirming Care Works?":

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/12/opinion/gender-affirming-care-cass-review.html?ogrp=dpl&unlocked_article_code=1.Uk4.DQBC.8tqXCn5oXKoT&smid=url-share

Or removing age guidelines on that "gender-affirming medicalization" -- AKA castrating and sterilizing:

"Unsealed Court Documents Show That Admiral Rachel Levine Pressured WPATH To Remove Age Guidelines From The Latest Standards Of Care":

https://jessesingal.substack.com/p/unsealed-court-documents-show-that

Some wag once jested that the Republicans (Nixon) had put a man on the moon, but that Democrats were putting many men into women's sports, prisons, and change rooms. You may wish to take a gander at a book by Substacker and lawyer Kara Dansky titled, "The Reckoning: How the Democrats and the Left Betrayed Women and Girls":

https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B0CN32BXC2/ref=cbw_us_ca_dp_narx_gl_book

There's one -- of the many -- reasons why the election is a toss-up.

Expand full comment

Republicans claim they put a man on the moon? Wow. Nixon took office in late-January 1969. In just just six short months he developed the Saturn V rocket, launched all those increasingly complex missions to and around the Moon, and then landed a man on the Moon in late-July 1969. Extraordinary.

Expand full comment

Literally … 🙄 It was a joke, one to emphasize the fact that Harris and Biden, and most Democrats, apparently haven't got a goddamn clue about the bedrock differences between males and females. And about their far-reaching consequences.

And who apparently “think” — being charitable — that Bruce Jenner saying “I identify as a woman, as an adult human female” makes him one. He won't EVER be a female, someone able to conceive, gestate, and give birth to a baby. Primarily because he doesn't have, won't EVER have the ovaries that are pretty much the essential requirement to qualify as a female.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Oct 31
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

What's your point? You have one? The traditional definition for "woman" is "adult human female":

"woman: : an adult female person"

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/woman

Are Bruce Jenner and Dylan Mulvaney males or females or sexless eunuchs?

Neither Biden nor Harris seem to have damn clue about the difference between males and females. A general cluelessness, particularly on the part of Democrats, which has rotted out much of our educational, legal, governmental, and scientific institutions. They should be sent to wander in the wilderness for the next four years if not longer for that alone.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 1
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

No problemo. But the problem isn't with the (some) few institutions which recognize the profound differences between sex and gender but with the many -- including the many politicians like Biden & Harris -- which don't have a goddamn clue -- in fact who make strenuous efforts to hide the differences.

The British Medical Journal, and the late great Justice Anton Scalia were among those few:

https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n735

https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep511/usrep511127/usrep511127.pdf

Many Statistics Departments all over the world are among the clueless many:

"Statistics Departments Corrupted by Gender Ideology"; https://humanuseofhumanbeings.substack.com/p/statistics-departments-corrupted

"Sex and the Office for National Statistics: A Case Study in Policy Capture": https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1467-923X.13029

See also:

"The Corrosive Impact of Transgender Ideology": https://www.civitas.org.uk/content/files/2454-A-The-Corrosive-Impact-of-TI-ppi-110-WEB.pdf

Much of our educational system:

"The Anti-Science Disaster of Gender Ideology in the Schools"; https://caroldansereau.substack.com/p/the-anti-science-disaster-of-gender

And your own Department of Education with their demented Title IX policies:

https://karadansky.substack.com/p/what-is-going-on-with-title-ix

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2024/06/18/new-title-ix-regulations-blocked-six-more-states

And your own "Rachel" Levine -- speaking of fish rotting from the head down -- who apparently thinks putting on a dress turns "her" into a female, and who is prepared to sacrifice dysphoric & autistic children to "her" ideology:

"Rachel Levine Must Resign: A case study in politics and ideology overruling science. With children as victims."; https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/rachel-levine-must-resign

"rotted out" is being charitable. "on death's doorstep" is maybe more accurate.

Expand full comment