6 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Republicans claim they put a man on the moon? Wow. Nixon took office in late-January 1969. In just just six short months he developed the Saturn V rocket, launched all those increasingly complex missions to and around the Moon, and then landed a man on the Moon in late-July 1969. Extraordinary.

Expand full comment

Literally … 🙄 It was a joke, one to emphasize the fact that Harris and Biden, and most Democrats, apparently haven't got a goddamn clue about the bedrock differences between males and females. And about their far-reaching consequences.

And who apparently “think” — being charitable — that Bruce Jenner saying “I identify as a woman, as an adult human female” makes him one. He won't EVER be a female, someone able to conceive, gestate, and give birth to a baby. Primarily because he doesn't have, won't EVER have the ovaries that are pretty much the essential requirement to qualify as a female.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Oct 31
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

What's your point? You have one? The traditional definition for "woman" is "adult human female":

"woman: : an adult female person"

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/woman

Are Bruce Jenner and Dylan Mulvaney males or females or sexless eunuchs?

Neither Biden nor Harris seem to have damn clue about the difference between males and females. A general cluelessness, particularly on the part of Democrats, which has rotted out much of our educational, legal, governmental, and scientific institutions. They should be sent to wander in the wilderness for the next four years if not longer for that alone.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 1
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

No problemo. But the problem isn't with the (some) few institutions which recognize the profound differences between sex and gender but with the many -- including the many politicians like Biden & Harris -- which don't have a goddamn clue -- in fact who make strenuous efforts to hide the differences.

The British Medical Journal, and the late great Justice Anton Scalia were among those few:

https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n735

https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep511/usrep511127/usrep511127.pdf

Many Statistics Departments all over the world are among the clueless many:

"Statistics Departments Corrupted by Gender Ideology"; https://humanuseofhumanbeings.substack.com/p/statistics-departments-corrupted

"Sex and the Office for National Statistics: A Case Study in Policy Capture": https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1467-923X.13029

See also:

"The Corrosive Impact of Transgender Ideology": https://www.civitas.org.uk/content/files/2454-A-The-Corrosive-Impact-of-TI-ppi-110-WEB.pdf

Much of our educational system:

"The Anti-Science Disaster of Gender Ideology in the Schools"; https://caroldansereau.substack.com/p/the-anti-science-disaster-of-gender

And your own Department of Education with their demented Title IX policies:

https://karadansky.substack.com/p/what-is-going-on-with-title-ix

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2024/06/18/new-title-ix-regulations-blocked-six-more-states

And your own "Rachel" Levine -- speaking of fish rotting from the head down -- who apparently thinks putting on a dress turns "her" into a female, and who is prepared to sacrifice dysphoric & autistic children to "her" ideology:

"Rachel Levine Must Resign: A case study in politics and ideology overruling science. With children as victims."; https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/rachel-levine-must-resign

"rotted out" is being charitable. "on death's doorstep" is maybe more accurate.

Expand full comment