Experts attribute absence of indictments and convictions for perjury to the highly technical nature of the offense. They point to problems in drafting indictments, in proving material relevance of the alleged false testimony and in meeting the stringent evidentiary rules.
Experts attribute absence of indictments and convictions for perjury to the highly technical nature of the offense. They point to problems in drafting indictments, in proving material relevance of the alleged false testimony and in meeting the stringent evidentiary rules.
Experts attribute absence of indictments and convictions for perjury to the highly technical nature of the offense. They point to problems in drafting indictments, in proving material relevance of the alleged false testimony and in meeting the stringent evidentiary rules.