That was really interesting. And thanks for the answer to the last question. Sounds like Trump would’ve been legally okay if he’d reported the check to Stormy if he’d done it before the end of November deadline. As I understand it, it’s legal, although morally reprehensible, to lie to the American people.
That was really interesting. And thanks for the answer to the last question. Sounds like Trump would’ve been legally okay if he’d reported the check to Stormy if he’d done it before the end of November deadline. As I understand it, it’s legal, although morally reprehensible, to lie to the American people.
I have never heard of anyone being allowed to testify in their trial without possibility of cross-examination. I suppose that would help avoid committing perjury?
That was really interesting. And thanks for the answer to the last question. Sounds like Trump would’ve been legally okay if he’d reported the check to Stormy if he’d done it before the end of November deadline. As I understand it, it’s legal, although morally reprehensible, to lie to the American people.
I have never heard of anyone being allowed to testify in their trial without possibility of cross-examination. I suppose that would help avoid committing perjury?