This podcast interview with George Conway was informative and gave average listeners like myself some insights of the strengths and weaknesses of the case against Donald Trump.
However, I do not think that George gave enough true credence as the possibility of that one or more Juror(s) voting against the Prosecution.
This podcast interview with George Conway was informative and gave average listeners like myself some insights of the strengths and weaknesses of the case against Donald Trump.
However, I do not think that George gave enough true credence as the possibility of that one or more Juror(s) voting against the Prosecution.
Very many Americans continually place their faith on some divine intervention in any critical situation, much as they have for generations sought and gotten the good guys in movies to swoop in to save humanity at the last moment, as reality rather than entertainment.
I agree. I think George is too optimistic because he’s a lawyer and can see this as a clear cut case of the evidence proving the crime. But we live in a country where 40% or so are completely devoted to Trump, and it seems very unlikely that not one of them is on this jury.
This podcast interview with George Conway was informative and gave average listeners like myself some insights of the strengths and weaknesses of the case against Donald Trump.
However, I do not think that George gave enough true credence as the possibility of that one or more Juror(s) voting against the Prosecution.
Very many Americans continually place their faith on some divine intervention in any critical situation, much as they have for generations sought and gotten the good guys in movies to swoop in to save humanity at the last moment, as reality rather than entertainment.
I agree. I think George is too optimistic because he’s a lawyer and can see this as a clear cut case of the evidence proving the crime. But we live in a country where 40% or so are completely devoted to Trump, and it seems very unlikely that not one of them is on this jury.