Her doctors advised her that due to her fetus' trisomy 18 diagnosis, the unborn baby had "virtually no chance of surviving." More than 95% of babies with the condition do not make it to birth, according to the Cleveland Clinic.
Perhaps the AG could explain what compelling interest the state of TX has in forcing a human being to risk her l…
Her doctors advised her that due to her fetus' trisomy 18 diagnosis, the unborn baby had "virtually no chance of surviving." More than 95% of babies with the condition do not make it to birth, according to the Cleveland Clinic.
Perhaps the AG could explain what compelling interest the state of TX has in forcing a human being to risk her life and health to carry a fetus 95% likely to die before birth and 100% likely to die within a few days if it is born alive? I am glad Ms Cox could leave the state to get health care, but what about the 100's, 1000's of women in the state of TX that can't. This is basically telling Dr's and hospitals that any abortion performed for any reason will be subject to prosecution by the state. The state supreme court happily splits hairs on exact legal definitions while assuring everyone it is a medical decision. This wreaks hypocrisy as the TX republican party proves decisively cruelty is indeed the point. How much more of this are you going to take TX?
A lot. Don't underestimate the level of cruelty and suffering delusional people will put on others because "it won't affect me".
TX legislators don't care about any of the hypocrisy. They revel in it. At this point they're mustache twirling comic book villains. The cruelty is the point. There's no saving lives, it's all power. Do as we say. We're not here to govern you, we're here to RULE you.
I'd bet an abortion referendum would get 60%+ support minimum in TX. The state would doubtless do everything to get out of it (see Ohio's comical efforts).
Her doctors advised her that due to her fetus' trisomy 18 diagnosis, the unborn baby had "virtually no chance of surviving." More than 95% of babies with the condition do not make it to birth, according to the Cleveland Clinic.
Perhaps the AG could explain what compelling interest the state of TX has in forcing a human being to risk her life and health to carry a fetus 95% likely to die before birth and 100% likely to die within a few days if it is born alive? I am glad Ms Cox could leave the state to get health care, but what about the 100's, 1000's of women in the state of TX that can't. This is basically telling Dr's and hospitals that any abortion performed for any reason will be subject to prosecution by the state. The state supreme court happily splits hairs on exact legal definitions while assuring everyone it is a medical decision. This wreaks hypocrisy as the TX republican party proves decisively cruelty is indeed the point. How much more of this are you going to take TX?
A lot. Don't underestimate the level of cruelty and suffering delusional people will put on others because "it won't affect me".
TX legislators don't care about any of the hypocrisy. They revel in it. At this point they're mustache twirling comic book villains. The cruelty is the point. There's no saving lives, it's all power. Do as we say. We're not here to govern you, we're here to RULE you.
I'd bet an abortion referendum would get 60%+ support minimum in TX. The state would doubtless do everything to get out of it (see Ohio's comical efforts).