Honest question: At what point should journalists, whom are also citizens of this nation besides just being journalists, be obligated to out their sources if their sources are being blatantly two-faced about something of such tremendous importance? At what point does their individual concern for their careers or devotion to journalistic ethics cross a line at the expense their country?
Honest question: At what point should journalists, whom are also citizens of this nation besides just being journalists, be obligated to out their sources if their sources are being blatantly two-faced about something of such tremendous importance? At what point does their individual concern for their careers or devotion to journalistic ethics cross a line at the expense their country?
Honest question: At what point should journalists, whom are also citizens of this nation besides just being journalists, be obligated to out their sources if their sources are being blatantly two-faced about something of such tremendous importance? At what point does their individual concern for their careers or devotion to journalistic ethics cross a line at the expense their country?
They’re waiting to write their books for the big reveal. It’s all a payday for MSM.
Hard Q to answer. I think you’d need to ask it to a journalist to be honest.
Yep. We are about two weeks away from burn your sources time.