7 Comments
founding
Sep 27, 2023Liked by Sonny Bunch

This may have been one of the best episodes on this podcast. Great work Sonny.

I find myself (sadly) in agreement with pretty much everything Mr. Taplin said. I always compare the path we are on to Dune. The issue is not whether AI will go sentient and destroy us a la Terminator; it is that those who control the AI tech (including soon, robots) will have such a chokehold on our economy that they will control everyone and everything. No question that this is the path that those who are spending billions on AI expect; otherwise the investments make no sense.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, I'm glad you enjoyed it. It's a slight departure from the usual show, a little more high level. But interesting stuff, for sure.

Expand full comment
Sep 21, 2023Liked by Sonny Bunch

The Big short is on Netflix and I’m reminded of the scene where the two young traders are leaving Vegas and dancing. Brad Pitt’s character yells at them about banking reducing everything to numbers, and I think that’s a good warning for all of us. Efficiencies, scale, etc are all great, but reducing every human aspect to a number maybe isn’t the healthiest path forward.

Expand full comment
Sep 18, 2023Liked by Sonny Bunch

Fascinating interview. I also think we're a lot closer to Brave New World than to 1984.

Expand full comment

Thanks for another great episode, Sonny.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for listening!

Expand full comment
founding
Sep 16, 2023Liked by Sonny Bunch

I think Jonathan’s quote from Camus reminds us that we have gotten into the habit of misusing the word “art”: ART is work of the imagination, not just a congealed agglomeration of pixels from other stuff! The technique of re-sorting pixels may yet be used to produce ART but I’m guessing it is going to require serious application of human imagination to create something truly novel, indeed even rebellious. Norte Dame and Brunelleschi’s dome simply should not have worked but there they stand. And we still read Shakespeare and Dickenson and Eliot and e.e. cummings. I can’t even get auto-correct to let me use that last poet’s preferred capitalization without fighting with it for 6 full minutes; whatever makes me think that its progeny and even its more sophisticated AI cousins will be able to produce novel greatness? If that fundamental question requires I retain faith in some transcendent “creativity,” I’m grateful for it. I’ll take Scorsese over the Gourmet Detective any day!😁

Expand full comment