We live in a country where roughly 50% of those eligible to vote choose not to. And yet we're supposed to believe that those braving enforcement at the border and then detention and deportation once here to make a living are going to risk exposure by voting illegally? How on earth does this make any sense and why doesn't anyone ever raise the implausibility of this scenario?
We live in a country where roughly 50% of those eligible to vote choose not to. And yet we're supposed to believe that those braving enforcement at the border and then detention and deportation once here to make a living are going to risk exposure by voting illegally? How on earth does this make any sense and why doesn't anyone ever raise the implausibility of this scenario?
We live in a country where roughly 50% of those eligible to vote choose not to. And yet we're supposed to believe that those braving enforcement at the border and then detention and deportation once here to make a living are going to risk exposure by voting illegally? How on earth does this make any sense and why doesn't anyone ever raise the implausibility of this scenario?