5 Comments
тна Return to thread

Well, one slight bit of potentially good news with disclaimers: Over on the Hill, Jonathan Turley has an article about Hillary's emails and Trump. He keeps hedging that Trump may face criminal charges (sort of in favor), but runs back to "But her emails!" as an argument against. The only laugh I've had all morning. If Trump's lost Turley will Concha be far behind?

Expand full comment

Comey and State Department both came out to say HRC had zero classified emails.

Expand full comment

Hillary cooperated with the investigation and released her server to the authorities when asked. Also, the documents she had that were marked as "classified" were catalogued as such after she had moved them to her server. Intent matters in this case.

Expand full comment

Intent and/or truth doesn't matter to Trump's Pets in most cases. Though a few cracks are appearing. Trump, true to form, is calling Barr a RINO.

Expand full comment

I take kind of an opposite tack on those what-abouts. "What about Hillary?!?"

knowltok: "Good point! I seem to remember pretty loud calls to lock her up. If the president and his attorney general from 2016-2020 couldn't get it done for all their trying, there must not have been anything there. I guess after years of investigation we'll see if anything is there with Trump. Though I don't seem to remember a bunch of whiney little bitches threatening riots over Hillary..."

Expand full comment