Here's what I think of Honig's statement: Isn't it the defense's job to make sure their client gets a fair trial? Isn't it their job to address the structural infirmities (no explanation given as to what THAT is) and argue in motion practice that the case is a strained, convoluted reach - BEFORE the jury is empaneled?
Here's what I think of Honig's statement: Isn't it the defense's job to make sure their client gets a fair trial? Isn't it their job to address the structural infirmities (no explanation given as to what THAT is) and argue in motion practice that the case is a strained, convoluted reach - BEFORE the jury is empaneled?
Here's what I think of Honig's statement: Isn't it the defense's job to make sure their client gets a fair trial? Isn't it their job to address the structural infirmities (no explanation given as to what THAT is) and argue in motion practice that the case is a strained, convoluted reach - BEFORE the jury is empaneled?