Honig's argument is about prosecutorial discretion in pursuing cases. Like Bill Barr's choice to tell the SDNY to drop any cases against "Individual 1" (Trump) when it was a serious enough issue that Trump's bagman Michael Cohen ended up in jail.
Or Barr's whitewashing of Mueller's report and the 9 or 10 obstruction charges that (Garland)…
Honig's argument is about prosecutorial discretion in pursuing cases. Like Bill Barr's choice to tell the SDNY to drop any cases against "Individual 1" (Trump) when it was a serious enough issue that Trump's bagman Michael Cohen ended up in jail.
Or Barr's whitewashing of Mueller's report and the 9 or 10 obstruction charges that (Garland) should have taken up upon Trump's leaving office.
Maybe Bragg's charge was bespoke. But given that the bureaucrats and judges in the Federal System decided that the rule of law shouldn't apply to Trump, I'm happy to see him have to face some sort of accountability.
Honig's argument is about prosecutorial discretion in pursuing cases. Like Bill Barr's choice to tell the SDNY to drop any cases against "Individual 1" (Trump) when it was a serious enough issue that Trump's bagman Michael Cohen ended up in jail.
Or Barr's whitewashing of Mueller's report and the 9 or 10 obstruction charges that (Garland) should have taken up upon Trump's leaving office.
Maybe Bragg's charge was bespoke. But given that the bureaucrats and judges in the Federal System decided that the rule of law shouldn't apply to Trump, I'm happy to see him have to face some sort of accountability.