reading sonnys views about the new movie as against the old, i am kinda reminded about my old field of structural engineering, and perhaps more about architecture......Most houses/structures designed by architects, are usually on general techniques and old plans[we did a joke poster in the engineering office of a architect driving away y…
reading sonnys views about the new movie as against the old, i am kinda reminded about my old field of structural engineering, and perhaps more about architecture......Most houses/structures designed by architects, are usually on general techniques and old plans[we did a joke poster in the engineering office of a architect driving away yelling at the engineer saying"get it built and we will do the plans after-its a engineering joke,as we always have to make whatever art the architects design actually standup and carry the loads to work-winks] , that have a fixed history of working, and generally the architects just tweak the old design, replacing old fixtures with the new, and run them out[its also a cost saving feature,saving time,hours of a redesign], but every now and then architects are given free reign to make something new , and its usually here the time , effort and hours[and cost] escalate, when the project becomes more "art" and less "work" or using sometime tried and tested....the project then becomes a hit or miss affair as the architect is trying to make a name for himself, as something new is created, sometimes it hits and their name[and design] are escalated into the architectural heights and other times[most times-engineers often sneer] it doesnt, causing unforeseen problems by trying something new.
Like the film here, it seems sonny is saying they should have kept the original design that worked, tweaked it, and sent it out to the fans who would be expecting more of the same...it seems that this was a new attempt to make something new for themselfs , and less about giving the fans what they wanted :(
reading sonnys views about the new movie as against the old, i am kinda reminded about my old field of structural engineering, and perhaps more about architecture......Most houses/structures designed by architects, are usually on general techniques and old plans[we did a joke poster in the engineering office of a architect driving away yelling at the engineer saying"get it built and we will do the plans after-its a engineering joke,as we always have to make whatever art the architects design actually standup and carry the loads to work-winks] , that have a fixed history of working, and generally the architects just tweak the old design, replacing old fixtures with the new, and run them out[its also a cost saving feature,saving time,hours of a redesign], but every now and then architects are given free reign to make something new , and its usually here the time , effort and hours[and cost] escalate, when the project becomes more "art" and less "work" or using sometime tried and tested....the project then becomes a hit or miss affair as the architect is trying to make a name for himself, as something new is created, sometimes it hits and their name[and design] are escalated into the architectural heights and other times[most times-engineers often sneer] it doesnt, causing unforeseen problems by trying something new.
Like the film here, it seems sonny is saying they should have kept the original design that worked, tweaked it, and sent it out to the fans who would be expecting more of the same...it seems that this was a new attempt to make something new for themselfs , and less about giving the fans what they wanted :(