Actually, Rachel Maddows was brought back and went from having one program a week to one a day, so what makes you imagine that MSNBC is "stopping" her?
As to Democrats: discrediting them is absolutely the wrong approach, because they're the only politicians warning us about what Bill describes above for a long time already, AND who are fi…
Actually, Rachel Maddows was brought back and went from having one program a week to one a day, so what makes you imagine that MSNBC is "stopping" her?
As to Democrats: discrediting them is absolutely the wrong approach, because they're the only politicians warning us about what Bill describes above for a long time already, AND who are fighting back (within the legal power that "we the people" gave them), so why do you then go on claiming that they "are discredited enough by their own doing"? What are you referring to more precisely?
You are a civil person who, when in disagreement, asks questions for clarification before jumping to impulsive conclusions, which is not a common virtue. Thank you! The Democrats miserably failed to disarm and defeat the brutal bullying strategy of the Republicans and Big Money in both Federal Houses, especially against the Harris campaign and the many decent members of the Biden-Harris Administration summoned to their respective hearings (to cite one hideous case, the Attorney General). In so doing, they preferred a calculated failure to losing the support of Big Money or the meager number of possible Republican votes. Such behavior could amount to betraying their constituency and their political platform, yet they preferred the risks involved. The wrong betting. They miserably lost. People who lose or betray are discredited by their loss and defeat. That is why I still believe the Democrats were discredited by their own doing. Perhaps I did not express my opinion adequately because of my unsatisfactory dominion of US English.
Thanks for reading my comment. Did you mean «brought back?» It is possible that I posted my comment while she was being «brought back.» At any rate, if I did not write it, then please accept my apologies.
Actually, Rachel Maddows was brought back and went from having one program a week to one a day, so what makes you imagine that MSNBC is "stopping" her?
As to Democrats: discrediting them is absolutely the wrong approach, because they're the only politicians warning us about what Bill describes above for a long time already, AND who are fighting back (within the legal power that "we the people" gave them), so why do you then go on claiming that they "are discredited enough by their own doing"? What are you referring to more precisely?
You are a civil person who, when in disagreement, asks questions for clarification before jumping to impulsive conclusions, which is not a common virtue. Thank you! The Democrats miserably failed to disarm and defeat the brutal bullying strategy of the Republicans and Big Money in both Federal Houses, especially against the Harris campaign and the many decent members of the Biden-Harris Administration summoned to their respective hearings (to cite one hideous case, the Attorney General). In so doing, they preferred a calculated failure to losing the support of Big Money or the meager number of possible Republican votes. Such behavior could amount to betraying their constituency and their political platform, yet they preferred the risks involved. The wrong betting. They miserably lost. People who lose or betray are discredited by their loss and defeat. That is why I still believe the Democrats were discredited by their own doing. Perhaps I did not express my opinion adequately because of my unsatisfactory dominion of US English.
Thanks for reading my comment. Did you mean «brought back?» It is possible that I posted my comment while she was being «brought back.» At any rate, if I did not write it, then please accept my apologies.