An approving tone in your article. Just seems to show Manchin, like pretty much every other politician in Washington, didn’t make his earlier stand on any actual principle s but just wanted to elevate his status and power by playing a game of timing the system. Is this what you are approving of? Manchin’s turnaround just shows he is willing to rob us a little slower than the rest of Washington, in order to advance his power.
That is different. Your argument is that because some candidate for office threatens to enforce laws against voter fraud that it is voter suppression. What laws are they threatening to enforce? I hope you are not suggesting that requiring someone to present an ID to vote is suppression? Also, I ask again, the GA bill that was recently passed increased the number of days for early voting and put in guidelines for the numbers of polling places that must be in each county. Now obviously for larger counties this could create issues. However, that was the case BEFORE the law was passed.
The biggest problem with the GA bill was the issue around who gets to count the votes. Now that is the actual threat to democracy.
Hmmm, right on everything? Can we all admit that the inflation matter was and remains a best guess - and truth to tell, no matter what anyone says, we have mostly on tool - the Fed and interest rates. We have only one more tool - tax excess profits (not saying they work but the data are difficult because the conditions are fluid).
Re the rest - ok the 50th vote for Dems has all the power. But that is because we are at best a flawed democratic republic designed to stop legislation.
—"balls-to-face" as in "the most lewd, balls-to-face poster in recent political history"
—"sonned" as in "sonned Mitch McConnell in the most graphic way imaginable" —
By the time I got to the end of the article, it sounded like something I'd be hearing in a locker room if I went to locker rooms. It even started smelling like one.
Maybe less locker room in future articles? Please? You don't need it. Sometimes less is more.
Listened to your Friday podcast with Charlie...One thing to think about regarding the "third party debate". I believe Tim mentioned that it would be better if sane Republicans ran as Dems rather than as independents yet you also mentioned in some states how the Dem "brand" was so tainted that it wouldn't help to run as a Dem. I think you may have even mentioned Evan McMullin in UT as an suggested example rather than him running as an Independent. A counterfactual to this argument was TX where a rationale ex-Republican (that I held hope for), Matthew Dowd, went absolutely nowhere in his Lt Gov race running as a Republican. And the reason I thought he dropped out of the Dem primary (i.e. didn't even get enough support to finish the primary) was because the Dems thought him "insufficiently Dem" given his past Republican bona fides.
Granted, that's just one example, but in some states a cross over candidate is having to overcome the Dem "brand" AND the sincerity of their commitment (and therefore purity to the values) to the Dem party. No easy answers. but the Independent "brand" of Forward or Independent may be the best option.
A multiplicity of approaches and varies from state to state. In the swing states 3rd parties are death. In states where the Democratic brand is toxic, if a reasonable independent emerges who could actually win, then the Democrats should consider not running a candidate and endorse the independent as they did in Utah.
But independent candidates should be independent and supported by Democrats on a case by case basis.
As long as there is an Electoral College then a 3rd Party running in all 50 states will generally harm, rather than help, our democracy. That is because in the 14 Blue states and 28 Red states they have no chance of winning so all they can do is skew the results in the swing states with devastating consequences (1968, 1992, 2001, 2016).
I agree. I would like to see honest Republicans vote for democrats and dems intelligently support independents. And a third party support dems or Indies but not run competing candidates. For a decade.
So what about this new third party? Could it be a place for Independents to hang their hat? I'd prefer seeing them support existing candidates like McMullin than run their own slate but ego being what it is that is probably a hopeless idea.
I love reading your articles and seeing you on MSNBC. I have been w/ Joe Manchin all along. I got sick of hearing Build Back Better. Now I'm hearing explainations of what they just passed.
Me too, but I can’t help but wonder what took Tim so long to start to question the ethics of The Game, just because he was in a bubble where everyone else was doing it. Maybe it’s because he has the peculiar curse of being really good at everything he does. When you are winning at something, there is not much incentive for self reflection.
This triumphalist Hymn of Praise to Saint Joe M. demonstrates his continued admiration of skillful Gaming by another consummate professional and yes, Manchin accomplished a lot but he did entirely it his own way. Perhaps we should instead contemplate what Biden and the Democrats would have accomplished if they had all worked together as a team, instead of being stymied at crucial moments by a political Prima-Donna with dubious loyalties.
Tim, it’s polite and good policy of course to announce that you’re subbing in for JVL when you write the Triad, but it is SO obvious in the difference in your writing styles, it’s hardly necessary. We can tell.
The GOP primary for Hassen's Senate has 11 candidates: Gerard Beloin, John Berman, Donald Bolduc, Bruce Fenton, Dennis Lamare, Edmond Laplante Jr., Andy Martin, Chuck Morse, Tejasinha Sivalingham, Kevin Smith, and Vikram Mansharamani. And most of these are first class nut jobs/insurrectionists/ MAGA pretenders. But I do expect an insurrectionist will surge from the pack as in other state primaries. It's the GOP way.
I also expect my neighbor, Joe, to declare. He'll fit in with his eight foot "Let's Go Brandon" banner hanging over his front door. Nice. A guy two doors down flaunts a ginormous white flag with black fist flashing that charming GOP brand. The middle finger. I won't be surprised if that guy runs for schoolboard. Where he can ban a few dozen books, promote open [teacher] carry, and stick all ten fingers in the eyes of all ten of the town's libs. Ah, my town. Ah, New Hampshire. The state with granite in their brains.
PS Pundits are so down on Hassen. They may focus on her milquetoast personality but they ignore her track record. The former NH governor gets elected/re-elected. Many, many times.
I mean, I don't Love the idea of opening up more federal lands to drilling and giving a pass to true carbon capture technology under coal. I also don't think inflation would have been any more drastic than it is under the BBB. Besides the fact that it was an economic package that would have been spent over a ten year period and the money supply is more of an ingredient of wages (being the biggest expense on a company's balance sheet) . A McDonalds worker going from $10 to $15 an hour in the span of 2 years would have more of an influence then a budget bill, just saying. But hey, there are some real opportunities to both reduce carbon footprints and get off foreign oil. I'd say Manchin pulled off an upset with the diplomatic tact worthy of LBJ. My feeling it was brinkmanship inside the party that brought him to the table tho.....AND I just don't think he had to do it. I think he could have made a relevant rational case for replacing coal jobs with repairing wind turbines, that most democrats would have accepted, without all the antics. Shit tho, build the man a statue, stack it right next to the one of Mike Pence. I could care less as long as we can agree that Climate Change is more of a threat to our way of life then a person's right to bear a child....not now but right now.
An approving tone in your article. Just seems to show Manchin, like pretty much every other politician in Washington, didn’t make his earlier stand on any actual principle s but just wanted to elevate his status and power by playing a game of timing the system. Is this what you are approving of? Manchin’s turnaround just shows he is willing to rob us a little slower than the rest of Washington, in order to advance his power.
Love it. Points out the value of reading everyone but trusting no one without vetifying.
Loved your book. I’ve read it twice. Well read once and audible the second time.
I wasn't going to ask, but it's killing me, I think I get the balls to face comment, but what is sonning?
Demeaning someone, usually verbally, as you refer to them as "son". Like you're their dad keeping them in their place.
Where does Tim go to get his "Tim is Always Right" t-shirt?
That is different. Your argument is that because some candidate for office threatens to enforce laws against voter fraud that it is voter suppression. What laws are they threatening to enforce? I hope you are not suggesting that requiring someone to present an ID to vote is suppression? Also, I ask again, the GA bill that was recently passed increased the number of days for early voting and put in guidelines for the numbers of polling places that must be in each county. Now obviously for larger counties this could create issues. However, that was the case BEFORE the law was passed.
The biggest problem with the GA bill was the issue around who gets to count the votes. Now that is the actual threat to democracy.
The JLVRA does not deal with that.
Hmmm, right on everything? Can we all admit that the inflation matter was and remains a best guess - and truth to tell, no matter what anyone says, we have mostly on tool - the Fed and interest rates. We have only one more tool - tax excess profits (not saying they work but the data are difficult because the conditions are fluid).
Re the rest - ok the 50th vote for Dems has all the power. But that is because we are at best a flawed democratic republic designed to stop legislation.
TIL:
—"balls-to-face" as in "the most lewd, balls-to-face poster in recent political history"
—"sonned" as in "sonned Mitch McConnell in the most graphic way imaginable" —
By the time I got to the end of the article, it sounded like something I'd be hearing in a locker room if I went to locker rooms. It even started smelling like one.
Maybe less locker room in future articles? Please? You don't need it. Sometimes less is more.
So if The Bulwark adopts Smell-o-Vision, I'm canceling my subscription. Miller, I can't trust you with Smell-o-Vision.
Listened to your Friday podcast with Charlie...One thing to think about regarding the "third party debate". I believe Tim mentioned that it would be better if sane Republicans ran as Dems rather than as independents yet you also mentioned in some states how the Dem "brand" was so tainted that it wouldn't help to run as a Dem. I think you may have even mentioned Evan McMullin in UT as an suggested example rather than him running as an Independent. A counterfactual to this argument was TX where a rationale ex-Republican (that I held hope for), Matthew Dowd, went absolutely nowhere in his Lt Gov race running as a Republican. And the reason I thought he dropped out of the Dem primary (i.e. didn't even get enough support to finish the primary) was because the Dems thought him "insufficiently Dem" given his past Republican bona fides.
Granted, that's just one example, but in some states a cross over candidate is having to overcome the Dem "brand" AND the sincerity of their commitment (and therefore purity to the values) to the Dem party. No easy answers. but the Independent "brand" of Forward or Independent may be the best option.
Just a thought.
A multiplicity of approaches and varies from state to state. In the swing states 3rd parties are death. In states where the Democratic brand is toxic, if a reasonable independent emerges who could actually win, then the Democrats should consider not running a candidate and endorse the independent as they did in Utah.
But independent candidates should be independent and supported by Democrats on a case by case basis.
As long as there is an Electoral College then a 3rd Party running in all 50 states will generally harm, rather than help, our democracy. That is because in the 14 Blue states and 28 Red states they have no chance of winning so all they can do is skew the results in the swing states with devastating consequences (1968, 1992, 2001, 2016).
agree.
I agree. I would like to see honest Republicans vote for democrats and dems intelligently support independents. And a third party support dems or Indies but not run competing candidates. For a decade.
So what about this new third party? Could it be a place for Independents to hang their hat? I'd prefer seeing them support existing candidates like McMullin than run their own slate but ego being what it is that is probably a hopeless idea.
I think HRC was right about the deplorables. The DO exist! They will be voting for baby dad Hershel and other MAGA liars.
I love reading your articles and seeing you on MSNBC. I have been w/ Joe Manchin all along. I got sick of hearing Build Back Better. Now I'm hearing explainations of what they just passed.
Manchin loves basking in the glow of fixing problems he created.
Interesting! one of those "I alone can fix it!" thingies?
Really enjoying Why We Did It. Very eye opening!
Me too, but I can’t help but wonder what took Tim so long to start to question the ethics of The Game, just because he was in a bubble where everyone else was doing it. Maybe it’s because he has the peculiar curse of being really good at everything he does. When you are winning at something, there is not much incentive for self reflection.
This triumphalist Hymn of Praise to Saint Joe M. demonstrates his continued admiration of skillful Gaming by another consummate professional and yes, Manchin accomplished a lot but he did entirely it his own way. Perhaps we should instead contemplate what Biden and the Democrats would have accomplished if they had all worked together as a team, instead of being stymied at crucial moments by a political Prima-Donna with dubious loyalties.
Tim, it’s polite and good policy of course to announce that you’re subbing in for JVL when you write the Triad, but it is SO obvious in the difference in your writing styles, it’s hardly necessary. We can tell.
Right?
I love reading both of their writings. It makes me wonder how do both of you guys act when together in a room? 😊
lol
Greetings from the Granite State.
The GOP primary for Hassen's Senate has 11 candidates: Gerard Beloin, John Berman, Donald Bolduc, Bruce Fenton, Dennis Lamare, Edmond Laplante Jr., Andy Martin, Chuck Morse, Tejasinha Sivalingham, Kevin Smith, and Vikram Mansharamani. And most of these are first class nut jobs/insurrectionists/ MAGA pretenders. But I do expect an insurrectionist will surge from the pack as in other state primaries. It's the GOP way.
I also expect my neighbor, Joe, to declare. He'll fit in with his eight foot "Let's Go Brandon" banner hanging over his front door. Nice. A guy two doors down flaunts a ginormous white flag with black fist flashing that charming GOP brand. The middle finger. I won't be surprised if that guy runs for schoolboard. Where he can ban a few dozen books, promote open [teacher] carry, and stick all ten fingers in the eyes of all ten of the town's libs. Ah, my town. Ah, New Hampshire. The state with granite in their brains.
PS Pundits are so down on Hassen. They may focus on her milquetoast personality but they ignore her track record. The former NH governor gets elected/re-elected. Many, many times.
I mean, I don't Love the idea of opening up more federal lands to drilling and giving a pass to true carbon capture technology under coal. I also don't think inflation would have been any more drastic than it is under the BBB. Besides the fact that it was an economic package that would have been spent over a ten year period and the money supply is more of an ingredient of wages (being the biggest expense on a company's balance sheet) . A McDonalds worker going from $10 to $15 an hour in the span of 2 years would have more of an influence then a budget bill, just saying. But hey, there are some real opportunities to both reduce carbon footprints and get off foreign oil. I'd say Manchin pulled off an upset with the diplomatic tact worthy of LBJ. My feeling it was brinkmanship inside the party that brought him to the table tho.....AND I just don't think he had to do it. I think he could have made a relevant rational case for replacing coal jobs with repairing wind turbines, that most democrats would have accepted, without all the antics. Shit tho, build the man a statue, stack it right next to the one of Mike Pence. I could care less as long as we can agree that Climate Change is more of a threat to our way of life then a person's right to bear a child....not now but right now.
Congrats on the book Tim. I just finished it last week. Appreciate the honesty, self reflection, and inside scoops!