Liz Cheney Comes to Play
Plus: Setting the record straight on the guy arrested at Trump’s rally and a hilariously corrupt Russian disinfo grift.
No throat-clearing fiddle-faddle to start today: Too much good stuff to get to! Happy Thursday.
Cheney’s Endorsement Was No Accident
—William Kristol
Liz Cheney spoke yesterday at Duke University, a very fine school known for being a five-time NCAA national men’s basketball champion. Like so many of those teams shaped by the great Coach K, Cheney came to play.
Honored by Duke as this year’s Sanford Distinguished Lecturer, Cheney engaged in a conversation with political scientist Peter Feaver on the subject of “Defending Democracy.”
As a former Republican leader in the House of Representatives and Vice Chair of the House’s January 6th Committee in 2022, Cheney had many important things to say on that broad topic. But what was notable is that she decided not simply to look back and reflect but to confront the challenge we face in defending our democracy now.
Speaking extemporaneously, Cheney said this to an auditorium full of students:
Donald Trump, no matter what your policy views are—no matter if you are a conservative Republican or not—Donald Trump cannot be trusted with power. The power of the presidency is the most awesome power of any office anywhere in the world, and the character of the people we elect really matters. And, so what I say is, I understand the desire to think that you’re casting a vote for conservative policies, but—first of all, he is not a conservative, and he’s dangerous, and this is not a policy election, and we can talk about getting this country back on track once we get through this election cycle—but Donald Trump, if he is reelected, will be far more dangerous than we have ever seen before.
He has told us he believes you can terminate the Constitution. He’s gone to war with the rule of law. He repeatedly suggests that the people who assaulted and attacked the Capitol should be celebrated. He has said he will ignore the rulings of the courts. He won’t leave office. He is a risk that we simply can’t take, and he has to be defeated.
I say that, not as a liberal Democrat. Not as someone who agrees with policies on the left most of the time, but he is simply a risk that, as a nation, we must never take again.
Because we are here in North Carolina, I think it is crucially important for people to recognize not only is what I’ve just said about the danger that Trump poses, something that should prevent people from voting for him, but I don’t believe that we have the luxury of writing in candidates’ names, particularly in swing states. And, as a conservative, as someone who believes in and cares about the Constitution, I have thought deeply about this, and because of the danger that Donald Trump poses, not only am I not voting for Donald Trump, but I will be voting for Kamala Harris.
And let me say that I think it is crucially important—and I would say especially to my fellow conservatives—that we think about the stakes and we think about the extent to which we have a duty, a duty, to put our country and our Constitution above partisanship. We all have that duty and responsibility.
That Cheney would endorse Kamala Harris in this year’s presidential election isn’t surprising. But most observers expected her to wait to do so until later in September.
But Cheney wasn’t being impulsive. She didn’t accidentally blurt out an endorsement whose debut had been planned for later. She knows that we are at a crucial moment in the campaign, after the Democratic convention and before next week’s debate. Harris has pulled even in the contest, but it’s on a razor’s edge. And some conservatives and Republicans—like former Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey earlier this week—have had the decency to shun Trump but are nonetheless shying away from endorsing Harris.
Cheney thinks sitting out the contest is a fundamental mistake and an unwitting evasion of responsibility. She believes now is the time to step up and help other conservatives and Republicans understand why they need to get off the bench when there’s so much at stake. Cheney’s former January 6th Committee colleague, Adam Kinzinger, and the former lieutenant governor of Georgia, Geoff Duncan, made this case eloquently at the Democratic convention. Now Cheney has put an exclamation point on their arguments, and has laid the groundwork for two months of reiterating and reinforcing them. Which I gather she’ll be doing though an extensive schedule of travel and events through all the swing states.
Why did Cheney announce her support of Harris in a conversation in front of students, rather than from a podium at a national convention or in the calm and professional setting of a television studio? Maybe it was just a matter of timing and convenience. But she may also have thought it appropriate to say what she had to say in a context different from the normal venues politicians inhabit. She made the case against Trump and for Harris at a discussion about defending democracy. That’s not an accident. She was emphasizing that the 2024 election isn’t just politics as usual.
It also won’t have escaped Cheney’s notice that she was being honored by Duke as the Sanford Distinguished Lecturer. Terry Sanford was a longtime president of Duke University. (Not the least of his accomplishments was that he hired Coach K.) But before that, from 1961 to 1965, Sanford was governor of North Carolina.
On January 14, 1963, George Wallace was sworn in as governor of Alabama, proclaiming in his inaugural address, “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.” Four days later, on January 18, 1963, Gov. Sanford chose to give a major speech of his own, in which he became the first southern governor to call for an end to racially discriminatory employment practices: “The time has come for American citizens to give up this reluctance, to quit unfair discrimination, and to give the Negro a full chance to earn a decent living for his family and to contribute to higher standards for himself and all men.”
The path of Terry Sanford or that of George Wallace? We faced that choice sixty years ago, and as a nation we eventually chose the right path. Today one of our two major parties has nominated, for the third consecutive time, Donald Trump, the most dangerous demagogue to emerge in American politics since Wallace, but made more dangerous by his greater electoral success.
There haven’t been very many latter-day Terry Sanfords: elected officials from Trump’s own party with the courage and capacity to speak up against him and the threat he represents. All honor to Liz Cheney for doing so.
Pennsylvania Man Speaks
—Andrew Egger
You may have seen viral clips of a scuffle at a Trump rally Saturday in Johnstown, Pennsylvania: A man was tased, subdued by security, and arrested after jumping a barrier and trying to climb a press riser. On #Resistance Twitter, a narrative quickly formed: A Trump supporter jazzed up on anti-media rhetoric had snapped and tried to dish out some violence against the Fake News.
In large part, this took hold because it’s what Trump himself thought was happening. “Beautiful—that’s beautiful,” Trump said from the stage. “That’s alright, that’s okay. No, he’s on our side. We get a little itchy . . . Don’t we?”
But it turns out there’s more to the story. Local police said yesterday that the man, Stephen Weiss of Pittsburgh, had actually been there to protest Trump. He was ultimately charged with misdemeanor disorderly conduct and resisting arrest.
In a phone call this week with The Bulwark, Weiss said he’d gone to the rally to make a statement. “I live in Pittsburgh, and I run an evangelical Christian mission—we work in one of the more marginalized neighborhoods in Pittsburgh, the kind of place that Donald Trump would never set foot in,” Weiss said. “Donald Trump has preyed on white evangelical Christians as if he’s somehow one.” (He added that he’d gone to the event and was speaking in his personal capacity, not as a representative of his nonprofit.)
Climbing the riser wasn’t the original plan. Weiss had just wanted to hold up this banner:
“Kind of spur of the moment I thought, well, if I go and I stand by the cameras Trump might notice me,” he said. “The only thing in this arena he cares about besides himself are these cameras.”
Obviously, things didn’t quite proceed as he’d envisioned. Later, Weiss was bemused to discover he’d gone viral, not as a protester, but as a supposed vector of anti-media MAGA rage.
Getting tased and tackled is nobody’s idea of a good time. But what really unsettled him, Weiss said, was Trump’s real-time response.
“That is the most horrifying thing I’ve ever heard said about something I’ve been a part of,” he told me. “To think that he’s just so openly comfortable with criminality and with violence by Americans against other Americans as long as he thinks it’ll help him—I mean, he’s just so transparently open about that. To think that he’s got a coin-flip chance of being in the White House and having basically no guardrails whatsoever, like absolute immunity—I think that’s really unnerving.”
What’s The Frequency, Tenet?
—Cathy Young
The Department of Justice unveiled an indictment yesterday that lifted the curtain on the latest Kremlin efforts to influence the upcoming presidential election in the United States.
And, well, none of it is terribly surprising.
It turns out the Kremlin funneled almost $10 million, via two RT (formerly Russia Today) employees, to a U.S.-based company that paid right-wing, pro-Trump online “influencers” for video content. The company, not named in the indictment, has been identified as Tennessee-based Tenet Media, a “network of heterodox commentators.” Among them: Benny Johnson, Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, and Lauren Southern. Tenet’s founders, BlazeTV host and Turning Point USA contributor Lauren Chen and her husband Liam Donovan, apparently knew where the funds came from. The influencers, according to the Justice Department, did not.
(For the record: not our Liam Donovan. Who knew it was such a common name?)
In that sense, the statements from Johnson, Pool, and Rubin claiming to be victims of the scheme are accurate. (Southern and Chen are both lying low.) But is it shocking that these particular influencers were acting as unwitting tools of the Kremlin? Not really, other than the amount they were paid ($100K per video!).
Pool has ranted that “Ukraine is the enemy of this country.” Rubin is always griping that we’re sending Ukraine too much money. Southern traveled to Russia back in 2018 to interview fascist guru and Ukraine war prophet Alexander Dugin. As for Chen, she’s a past RT contributor and consistent peddler of Kremlin talking points.
The Treasury Department also announced sanctions against ten Russians and two RT-related companies behind the scheme.
This is still a developing story. Will Sommer, who is covering it for the Washington Post, will be a guest on our YouTube page today. For now, we don’t know to what extent the stooges were influenced by Kremlin cash. It’s unclear when the payouts began; Tenet wasn’t formally launched until last October. Ultimately, $10 million isn’t that much in the world of either foreign influence or online media. And maybe that’s the most newsworthy part of this: The ROI is not so bad when you have a depressing convergence between right-wing “heterodoxy” and Kremlin propaganda.
Cheap Shots
Liz has been endorsing Democrats for a couple of years now. As you say, this wasn’t surprising.
I’ve seen a number of my fellow Democrats spurn her support because they dislike all that she has stood for as a politician. Fair point. It’s useless to try to convince them that like Adam Kinzinger she threw away her career and her power and influence because she is a patriot.
But she is. Were Trump to be reelected, she’d be in actual danger. She’s the mother of five; I doubt if a military tribunal and prison (or worse) is how she wants to spend her future Thanksgivings.
There are a lot of Republicans out there who are Pat Toomeys. They don’t want Trump but “principle” means they can’t vote for Harris. They’re Philip Nolans (at least they think so; I think it’s a lot of hooey. We don’t have ringworm) and like Nolan, must not read the news.
Cheney gave them permission to do the unthinkable, this time.
Liz Cheney makes me feel as though there are still conservative pols with the clarity of mind, mission, and moment. Of course there aren’t enough of them, but she and Adam Kinzinger represent the best and longed-for values I yearn to see demonstrated. One of my daughters had planned on writing in Cheney, but after she read Cheney’s Duke remarks she realized her duty is clear: Check the box for Harris.