12 Comments

I'll just note that Caesar, Catiline, Clodio and Crassus were not nice people in their time just before the Roman Civil War. (And where is Pompey in the movie anyway?) And say what you like about Cicero (and why change his daughter's name from Tulia?) he wasn't the one who brought chaos and war to the late stage Roman Republic.

I haven't seen the movie and the names may just be names, but these are not the people I would valorize. In the end, they were chaos monkeys.

Expand full comment
3 hrs ago·edited 3 hrs ago

The thing that struck me is that it was both a justification for and indictment of the studio system. The film desperately needed an adult in the room to collaborate with Coppola and try to hone all of his ideas and his visuals into a cohesive and consistent whole. It’s like he knew this was his last film and he didn’t want to leave anything left unsaid. The disparate mess takes away from individual moments of brilliance in acting, ideas, and visuals. The film vacillates wildly between themes and visuals… I wish he would have settled on a unified approach. One could imagine the best version being the Terry Gilliam-esque satire that Voight, Plaza, and LaBeouf embody. For all the talk of Coppola indulging in weed during the production, it feels more like he was on cocaine.

Last thought, Nathalie Emmanuel was the worst part in whatever version of this movie this could have or should have been.

Expand full comment
3 hrs agoLiked by Sonny Bunch

You reviewed a movie I had no interest in seeing. And now…. I have to see it.

Notes from Pauline Kael,

Alison

Expand full comment

“Incoherently idealistic” and a “straightforwardly fascist tale about the need of a brilliant leader to guide the dull masses and the corrupt elite out of the muck in which they wallow and into a brighter future, democracy be damned.” Very good reasons to ignore this film.

But so many brilliant actors going “bonkers” at “110% of the required wattage” …I kinda have to watch this movie now.

(Also as an admittedly generic and poorly aimed protest vote against the big studios’ assumption that only the lowest common denominators are worth pursuing)

Expand full comment
4 hrs agoLiked by Sonny Bunch

I suspect Megapolis will be much like Babylon a few years ago: a somewhat ponderous, at times vacuous film that will find its audience with time and with it a new appreciation for it completely missing at the time of its premiere

Expand full comment
author

Yeah I think BABYLON is a mess but it’s a mess with soul and style and those generate cults.

Expand full comment

I really hope in like 10 years it gets some retrospectives. It really is just a gorgeous mess of a movie, but it's a mess like you said with soul. And absolutely incredible sound and set design. I think if it had had a strong editor instead of being one of those immediate-post pandemic longer movies it'd have been much more well received

Expand full comment
4 hrs agoLiked by Sonny Bunch

I lol-ed at your closing line. Chef's kiss!

Expand full comment

Sonny, I learn so much from your reviews.

Could this film reach audiences through editing for the masses along with a narration?

Expand full comment
author

It has narration! I don’t think it helps.

Expand full comment

Give Coppola enough time, and he'll probably recut the movie himself. Megalopolis Redux. But not for the masses. Start drinking now, Mr. Bunch, and he can start raising more cash.

Expand full comment

I read that it was long in gestation. Like, decades long. Like Cimino’s “Heaven’s Gate”. That bomb. Milk kept too long in a refrigerator curdles. Sours. As do cinema ideas. It looks curdled.

Expand full comment