Thanks for the clarification of your meaning, and I understand what you are saying. Adding the distinction between state and federal candidates probably will fall under the "originalist" rubric that the Court loves to use when it increases federal power in the way they like. Of course, when it does not please them, they love the "originalist" thought behind States Rights, too. 😏
Thanks for the clarification of your meaning, and I understand what you are saying. Adding the distinction between state and federal candidates probably will fall under the "originalist" rubric that the Court loves to use when it increases federal power in the way they like. Of course, when it does not please them, they love the "originalist" thought behind States Rights, too. 😏
Thanks for the clarification of your meaning, and I understand what you are saying. Adding the distinction between state and federal candidates probably will fall under the "originalist" rubric that the Court loves to use when it increases federal power in the way they like. Of course, when it does not please them, they love the "originalist" thought behind States Rights, too. 😏
Well put!
Thanks. One can think of it as "moving the goalposts", too.