One event does not a conclusion make. You have committed the fallacy of omitting the denominator, in this case of all the other unscripted events he has participated in. Just post debate he participated in around fifteen events, most unscripted, and the press mentioned only two of the events: The NC rally and the ABC interview (Make that…
One event does not a conclusion make. You have committed the fallacy of omitting the denominator, in this case of all the other unscripted events he has participated in. Just post debate he participated in around fifteen events, most unscripted, and the press mentioned only two of the events: The NC rally and the ABC interview (Make that three. I saw some coverage of his on-air call to Morning Joe). Notably missing is his appearance at Waffle HOuse the same night as the debate where he was just fine, almost as if the cold medicine had worn off.
The main point is preemptively replacing Biden with Harris is functionally the same as avoiding all this emotional overreaction, and if it should turn out that Biden is unable to complete his second term, then you get Harris anyway.
One event does not a conclusion make. You have committed the fallacy of omitting the denominator, in this case of all the other unscripted events he has participated in. Just post debate he participated in around fifteen events, most unscripted, and the press mentioned only two of the events: The NC rally and the ABC interview (Make that three. I saw some coverage of his on-air call to Morning Joe). Notably missing is his appearance at Waffle HOuse the same night as the debate where he was just fine, almost as if the cold medicine had worn off.
The main point is preemptively replacing Biden with Harris is functionally the same as avoiding all this emotional overreaction, and if it should turn out that Biden is unable to complete his second term, then you get Harris anyway.