14 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

"Because normal people—people who are not reading newsletters such as this..."

Tim.... are you calling us "weird"?

Expand full comment

That’s what I heard—and I had to agree.

Expand full comment

Maybe: "unrepresentative" :)

Expand full comment

Nice try. We know what you really meant.

Expand full comment

If you guys hadn't taken "queer" from us, we'd have our answer. Can we just borrow it for a coupla months? (Smiley Face emoji)

Expand full comment

Weird but not creepy. Those other dudes are creepy; we're just weird.

Expand full comment

The good kind of weird. I'll own it.

Expand full comment

"Weird," but "revenge of the nerds" weird, not "I track young women's periods on a spreadsheet" weird a/k/a creepy.

Expand full comment

I heard a suggestion on Talking Feds that the term should be "weird and gross" to describe many of the Trump/GOP hoped-for policies. It's weird and gross to track women's periods. It's weird and gross to monitor pregnant women. It's weird and gross to take people's health insurance away.

Expand full comment

I want people to start using the word "creepy." More accurate and packs more punch than "weird."

Expand full comment

I'm trying to think of and encourage "weird" as a gateway to "creepy." Or that fine old Southernism "not right," because that works on so, so many levels.

Expand full comment

Ooh I love "not right." Covers a lot of ground, people can fill in the blanks on their own fears or prejudices.

One of the Bulwark commenters was absolutely hilarious about JD Vance drinking DIET Mountain Dew. Something about "Only ladies drink diet soda, or people with something wrong with them."

It was deliberately/sarcastically/tongue-in-cheek sexist and homophobic, and such a good burn on Vance. "Not right" is even better. "That boy's not right," a la King of the Hill.

Expand full comment

The cheese done slipped off that boy's cracker.

Expand full comment

Well put!

Expand full comment