I agree about the need for a woman and her doctor to make choices based on the viability of the fetus and the health of the mother, as it was under Roe. When I hear, "Democrats want abortion to be legal with no restrictions", it's disengenuous and misleading. It sounds reckless. Late term abortions are extremely rare. If the public is se…
I agree about the need for a woman and her doctor to make choices based on the viability of the fetus and the health of the mother, as it was under Roe. When I hear, "Democrats want abortion to be legal with no restrictions", it's disengenuous and misleading. It sounds reckless. Late term abortions are extremely rare. If the public is serious about protecting the health of the baby and the mother, which Republicans are not, then "no restrictions" is necessary.
Yep. The problem is, honestly, with the idea of “restrictions.” Yes it makes for a fabulous talking point and political add. However, that rhetoric gets turned into legal statues which then gets interpreted by lawyers for both the hospital and litigants.
Let’s use just a dumb example. Let’s say a woman gets pregnant. The timing is a bit off but she is happy have a baby. Then in the 22 wee& she finds out that the child has a 50% of surviving or 10% or 90%. Pick a number. It doesn’t really matter honestly because the month we to be is the one who has to deal with all the consequences
I agree about the need for a woman and her doctor to make choices based on the viability of the fetus and the health of the mother, as it was under Roe. When I hear, "Democrats want abortion to be legal with no restrictions", it's disengenuous and misleading. It sounds reckless. Late term abortions are extremely rare. If the public is serious about protecting the health of the baby and the mother, which Republicans are not, then "no restrictions" is necessary.
Yep. The problem is, honestly, with the idea of “restrictions.” Yes it makes for a fabulous talking point and political add. However, that rhetoric gets turned into legal statues which then gets interpreted by lawyers for both the hospital and litigants.
Let’s use just a dumb example. Let’s say a woman gets pregnant. The timing is a bit off but she is happy have a baby. Then in the 22 wee& she finds out that the child has a 50% of surviving or 10% or 90%. Pick a number. It doesn’t really matter honestly because the month we to be is the one who has to deal with all the consequences