I think what he legitimizes most is the idea that it's quite acceptable to break rules (i.e.., violate laws) in the fight against your enemies; and that if the institutions try to uphold the rules against a transgressor on your own side, it just proves that the institutions are corrupt.
I think what he legitimizes most is the idea that it's quite acceptable to break rules (i.e.., violate laws) in the fight against your enemies; and that if the institutions try to uphold the rules against a transgressor on your own side, it just proves that the institutions are corrupt.
I think what he legitimizes most is the idea that it's quite acceptable to break rules (i.e.., violate laws) in the fight against your enemies; and that if the institutions try to uphold the rules against a transgressor on your own side, it just proves that the institutions are corrupt.