No, Purple, it speaks volumes about the intelligence of the 1/6 Committee's Democratic leadership, who were wise to make a hard-right Republican their prosecutor-in-chief. It was a brilliant strategy that Democrats don't usually employ, and good for them for being willing to sit back and watch Liz do her thing.
No, Purple, it speaks volumes about the intelligence of the 1/6 Committee's Democratic leadership, who were wise to make a hard-right Republican their prosecutor-in-chief. It was a brilliant strategy that Democrats don't usually employ, and good for them for being willing to sit back and watch Liz do her thing.
Cheneys are masters at political knifework, and it shows here. Nothing less will do in the march to destroy the tyranny of Trumpism.
Dems are running this investigation damn near perfectly. Republicans are only good at running their mouths. Trump and the GOP rage-spittle prove how well this DEMocratic plan is working.
I agree. The only real stumble was the drawn-out opening statements that were rather yawn-worthy. Unfortunately that wasted the first part of a prime time chunk of time and probably caused more than a few to watch or do something else. The rest has been masterful.
You’re right. Opening statements for this kind of hearings should be short, sweet, dynamic, and short again. Duck Wolf would have done it perfectly 😎 Rest has been stellar.
I'm afraid it was, Deborah. Purple slimed the Democrats on the committee--the ones doing all the quiet heavy lifting on the investigations end--by saying that the Republican was the only one doing anything worthwhile. That is not remotely true. Liz Cheney is doing a marvelous job as the power forward of this team. But the team of Democrats is feeding her the ball again and again so she can slam-dunk the information to the public.
Purple's slime was ridiculous and not remotely true.
Yes, Deborah, actually the statement was in conflict! . Purple was stating that she's the only one on the committee who has been effective. He was saying that either because he's ignorant of what th 1/6 members themselves say about it (including Liz); OR he was saying it just to be mean-spirited and trying to "own" the Libs. It was a jackassed thing to say. Because it was spreading false information. I hope Charlie takes it down. I need The Bulwark to keep things True and Factual.
No, Purple, it speaks volumes about the intelligence of the 1/6 Committee's Democratic leadership, who were wise to make a hard-right Republican their prosecutor-in-chief. It was a brilliant strategy that Democrats don't usually employ, and good for them for being willing to sit back and watch Liz do her thing.
Cheneys are masters at political knifework, and it shows here. Nothing less will do in the march to destroy the tyranny of Trumpism.
Dems are running this investigation damn near perfectly. Republicans are only good at running their mouths. Trump and the GOP rage-spittle prove how well this DEMocratic plan is working.
I agree. The only real stumble was the drawn-out opening statements that were rather yawn-worthy. Unfortunately that wasted the first part of a prime time chunk of time and probably caused more than a few to watch or do something else. The rest has been masterful.
You’re right. Opening statements for this kind of hearings should be short, sweet, dynamic, and short again. Duck Wolf would have done it perfectly 😎 Rest has been stellar.
But what Purple said wasn’t in conflict at all with your statement.
I'm afraid it was, Deborah. Purple slimed the Democrats on the committee--the ones doing all the quiet heavy lifting on the investigations end--by saying that the Republican was the only one doing anything worthwhile. That is not remotely true. Liz Cheney is doing a marvelous job as the power forward of this team. But the team of Democrats is feeding her the ball again and again so she can slam-dunk the information to the public.
Purple's slime was ridiculous and not remotely true.
Yes, Deborah, actually the statement was in conflict! . Purple was stating that she's the only one on the committee who has been effective. He was saying that either because he's ignorant of what th 1/6 members themselves say about it (including Liz); OR he was saying it just to be mean-spirited and trying to "own" the Libs. It was a jackassed thing to say. Because it was spreading false information. I hope Charlie takes it down. I need The Bulwark to keep things True and Factual.