Taunting me, or anyone else here, is not going to move your point forward one centimeter. The vote in the House was on strict party lines. You might well ask why no Democrats voted against it, but you will not. The vote in the Senate also missed the mark, but you rush to single out one person as responsible for all failure. Others here pointed out the size and scope of the legislation, which is something to consider. It may or may not have been overreach, but there were things in it that bill, such as the creation of a federal holiday, redistricting and campaign finance which may have been best treated in other legislation. All of this, recall, when the matter of closing a loophole in the 1871 legislation, which Trump and his minions were exploiting, went untended. The loophole still has not been fixed, and now the Supreme Court in its next session may end up rendering this moot. In the meantime, Liz Cheyney is quite seriously trying to defeat a cult of personality which is infecting the Republican Party. She has my support for that.
I asked a question, which you refuse to answer. Cheney is doing no such thing. She is just offended by Trump's manner. She has spent her life trying to advance white supremacy and Christian nationalism. Pretending she hasn't is why we are where we are
So, she flipped on voting rights protections? Got proof of that?
Taunting me, or anyone else here, is not going to move your point forward one centimeter. The vote in the House was on strict party lines. You might well ask why no Democrats voted against it, but you will not. The vote in the Senate also missed the mark, but you rush to single out one person as responsible for all failure. Others here pointed out the size and scope of the legislation, which is something to consider. It may or may not have been overreach, but there were things in it that bill, such as the creation of a federal holiday, redistricting and campaign finance which may have been best treated in other legislation. All of this, recall, when the matter of closing a loophole in the 1871 legislation, which Trump and his minions were exploiting, went untended. The loophole still has not been fixed, and now the Supreme Court in its next session may end up rendering this moot. In the meantime, Liz Cheyney is quite seriously trying to defeat a cult of personality which is infecting the Republican Party. She has my support for that.
I asked a question, which you refuse to answer. Cheney is doing no such thing. She is just offended by Trump's manner. She has spent her life trying to advance white supremacy and Christian nationalism. Pretending she hasn't is why we are where we are