Steve Bannon, and others, may well LOVE to talk about the PLANS, THREATS and the FAFO scenarios, THIS FAST, but I found the news conference, and comments from Trump, most interesting and cringey.
But first, the DOJ, are who capitulated first, over all we speak of today...all the way back to Russia, Russia, Russia and campaign details and …
Steve Bannon, and others, may well LOVE to talk about the PLANS, THREATS and the FAFO scenarios, THIS FAST, but I found the news conference, and comments from Trump, most interesting and cringey.
But first, the DOJ, are who capitulated first, over all we speak of today...all the way back to Russia, Russia, Russia and campaign details and omissions from 2015, regarding Trump, and those who knew. Smith wasn't bound by law to drop anything either.
That said, doesn't make this settlement sit any less grossly perverse when ABC/GS, were only "semantically" parroting a judges own words, not their own. Trump's lawyer, for immunity, loved the word semantics, semantically speaking.
Back to most interesting. Does friendship, by declaring a new personality, seemingly not a Sybil scenario although he's capable, and warm thoughts of now wanting to hold hands in public, come by an organic change through realizing the shelves are empty of anything decent and restocking with moral clarity? I don't think so! No one would be that fooled except the most malleable of fools. Was that fool present in the room at the news conference?
So, the authoritarian, as weak as they are, seem to relish in others grifting attention and adulation, in reverse to avoid consequences, to see this new grift, as a true and authentic new found fondness of what, the receiver states changed to their great surprise, as if, but knows they've only gotten worse and is putting a show on for us or themselves?
It can't be authentic or organic but a grift of the grifter, right or not? Am I off base that this is a realization or a BIG LIE to themselves they purely aren't aware of? It's embarrassing to watch at this level.
If that's the case, what do the masses do, to push back if we have no worthy grift, to give, to radically change stance or play reverse psychology? Wonder what professor Snyder would say? We aren't Russia, circa 1990, or Germany, circa 1930-40s, but we have the internet and Muskrat and a billion other shitty things like the SCOTUS and now a declared post constitutional era.
I opine it was all due to the pandemic that only the Dems/libs were capable of unleashing, on purpose, to hurt themselves in reality, but only if one thinks like a MAGA. The dynamic here is unfolding so fast is burnout likely?
A grand one night stand, that steams to a full relationship, of lust over love, when it's before the "unrobing", and potential possibilities, that will never look good once the robe is gone.
The couple's, threesomes, infinite-somes, raging, petting, horny to bed, perverse tendencies fulfilled, wake only to find out that what they went to bed with wasn't what they want to look at every day, for four years, as penetration has now infected the very thing that led to the grand one night stand and they have pain and itching and it won't stop.
Knowing the infection existed, doesn't matter, they both went forward, but does the infection indicate death for one of them or does it tie them together forever and for all? Bromance/Billionmance may not want tied down that long as autonomy, for them, will be hard to give up, for so long, knowing it only takes a few hundred million to stop things they know leaves them at the alter alone in the end. Give or take a few more loopholes or regulations or assassinations.
Can it possibly look that way or end that way in this scenario?
If a hillbilly or a suburbanite or a "fill in the blank" can vote against their interests and be unaware for so long, can it happen to those, together with enough money to step up, after integrity and the wife and kids finally show up, save what matters to them or are they all destined to remain infected, sick, itchy and painful for.......more fake adulation or something like crypto?
Citizen with no answers. I suggested "tolling" the election until he proved his innocence but was thrown the book at!!!! College is not for all. Christianity isn't and certainly some will never take enough puberty blockers to come down to the reality that men are, in fact, physically stronger than most women, in body, for sports.....etc, etc. I'll get rolled but it's facts that matter when comprise was and is necessary, for things and people to get uninfected/unwoke or whatever du jour.
Gotta have radical ideas to a novel radical situation no one seems to interpret any way other than just a wholesome democracy, voting in the dark, playing jurors, just bellied up and folded over to the tune of migrants, messaging, irony, lies and inflation. I'm not convinced. Corruption will always be a force. How does it end if we can't enter the mud pit, counter ambition with ambition, and not leave something out, as we just witnessed and lost another, now to the Founders idea of tyranny, for the third time?
Steve Bannon, and others, may well LOVE to talk about the PLANS, THREATS and the FAFO scenarios, THIS FAST, but I found the news conference, and comments from Trump, most interesting and cringey.
But first, the DOJ, are who capitulated first, over all we speak of today...all the way back to Russia, Russia, Russia and campaign details and omissions from 2015, regarding Trump, and those who knew. Smith wasn't bound by law to drop anything either.
That said, doesn't make this settlement sit any less grossly perverse when ABC/GS, were only "semantically" parroting a judges own words, not their own. Trump's lawyer, for immunity, loved the word semantics, semantically speaking.
Back to most interesting. Does friendship, by declaring a new personality, seemingly not a Sybil scenario although he's capable, and warm thoughts of now wanting to hold hands in public, come by an organic change through realizing the shelves are empty of anything decent and restocking with moral clarity? I don't think so! No one would be that fooled except the most malleable of fools. Was that fool present in the room at the news conference?
So, the authoritarian, as weak as they are, seem to relish in others grifting attention and adulation, in reverse to avoid consequences, to see this new grift, as a true and authentic new found fondness of what, the receiver states changed to their great surprise, as if, but knows they've only gotten worse and is putting a show on for us or themselves?
It can't be authentic or organic but a grift of the grifter, right or not? Am I off base that this is a realization or a BIG LIE to themselves they purely aren't aware of? It's embarrassing to watch at this level.
If that's the case, what do the masses do, to push back if we have no worthy grift, to give, to radically change stance or play reverse psychology? Wonder what professor Snyder would say? We aren't Russia, circa 1990, or Germany, circa 1930-40s, but we have the internet and Muskrat and a billion other shitty things like the SCOTUS and now a declared post constitutional era.
I opine it was all due to the pandemic that only the Dems/libs were capable of unleashing, on purpose, to hurt themselves in reality, but only if one thinks like a MAGA. The dynamic here is unfolding so fast is burnout likely?
A grand one night stand, that steams to a full relationship, of lust over love, when it's before the "unrobing", and potential possibilities, that will never look good once the robe is gone.
The couple's, threesomes, infinite-somes, raging, petting, horny to bed, perverse tendencies fulfilled, wake only to find out that what they went to bed with wasn't what they want to look at every day, for four years, as penetration has now infected the very thing that led to the grand one night stand and they have pain and itching and it won't stop.
Knowing the infection existed, doesn't matter, they both went forward, but does the infection indicate death for one of them or does it tie them together forever and for all? Bromance/Billionmance may not want tied down that long as autonomy, for them, will be hard to give up, for so long, knowing it only takes a few hundred million to stop things they know leaves them at the alter alone in the end. Give or take a few more loopholes or regulations or assassinations.
Can it possibly look that way or end that way in this scenario?
If a hillbilly or a suburbanite or a "fill in the blank" can vote against their interests and be unaware for so long, can it happen to those, together with enough money to step up, after integrity and the wife and kids finally show up, save what matters to them or are they all destined to remain infected, sick, itchy and painful for.......more fake adulation or something like crypto?
Citizen with no answers. I suggested "tolling" the election until he proved his innocence but was thrown the book at!!!! College is not for all. Christianity isn't and certainly some will never take enough puberty blockers to come down to the reality that men are, in fact, physically stronger than most women, in body, for sports.....etc, etc. I'll get rolled but it's facts that matter when comprise was and is necessary, for things and people to get uninfected/unwoke or whatever du jour.
Gotta have radical ideas to a novel radical situation no one seems to interpret any way other than just a wholesome democracy, voting in the dark, playing jurors, just bellied up and folded over to the tune of migrants, messaging, irony, lies and inflation. I'm not convinced. Corruption will always be a force. How does it end if we can't enter the mud pit, counter ambition with ambition, and not leave something out, as we just witnessed and lost another, now to the Founders idea of tyranny, for the third time?