Ironically, I was led to the article from Cathy Young by today's correction, and the amendment is simply not sufficient for an error of this magnitude. I don't think they should stop publishing articles from Cathy Young, but at an editorial level I'm very disappointed with the way this was handled. At a minimum an article featuring a ful…
Ironically, I was led to the article from Cathy Young by today's correction, and the amendment is simply not sufficient for an error of this magnitude. I don't think they should stop publishing articles from Cathy Young, but at an editorial level I'm very disappointed with the way this was handled. At a minimum an article featuring a full-throated apology and an explanation of what led to the decision to run this piece is in order. Regretfully canceling my subscription due to this reminder that the Bulwark is becoming more of a right-wing publication and not the publication that either avoided commenting on culture war issues like this or dealt with them more broadly. It's just gross that they felt the need to run the article before the dust had even settled around the matter.
Ironically, I was led to the article from Cathy Young by today's correction, and the amendment is simply not sufficient for an error of this magnitude. I don't think they should stop publishing articles from Cathy Young, but at an editorial level I'm very disappointed with the way this was handled. At a minimum an article featuring a full-throated apology and an explanation of what led to the decision to run this piece is in order. Regretfully canceling my subscription due to this reminder that the Bulwark is becoming more of a right-wing publication and not the publication that either avoided commenting on culture war issues like this or dealt with them more broadly. It's just gross that they felt the need to run the article before the dust had even settled around the matter.