
Donald Trump is a real president, though mostly he seems to enjoy playing the role of āPresident Trumpā on Twitter (and TV). His recent stunt, using force to clear Lafayette Square of peaceful protesters so he could snap a photo of himself in front of St. Johnās Episcopal Church holding a Bible, is only the most grotesque example of his performance art.
Using the Bible as a prop, not a book of wisdom or instruction that might offer illumination or healing, is altogether consistent with his presidency. And if you listen to him talk about the Bible, itās clear he has no idea whatās inside. (Ditto the Constitution.)
It's been that way since he descended from the gold escalator at Trump Tower to announce he was running for president, where he blathered on about all manner of nonsense. He knew nothing about anything. A month later, he insisted John McCain wasnāt a war hero because, you know, war heroes donāt get captured. What did that statement even mean? It was ignorant of history, the lawful rules of combat, and how war actually worksānot to mention moral sense, human empathy, and patriotism.
But meaning wasnāt really the point. The point was the performative act of saying something outrageous. Like generations of avant-garde artistes before him, the point of Trumpās art is not to make an argument or do something constructive. Itās to Ć©pater la bourgeoisie.
And so it has been for the last four yearsāwhich only seems like since time immemorial.
This styleāpolitics as performance artāis the hallmark of the Trump aesthetic, embraced by MAGA world intellects, citizens, and politicians.
The Flight 93 Election? The idea was preposterous on its face: An intellectually preening essay, dressed up with citations to political philosophy. It was not a proposal, but a pose.
The idea that the banal Hillary Clinton was an existential threat to the American constitutional experiment was, even then, pathetically silly. The idea that stopping her required the intervention of the deeply illiberal, ignorant, and inexperienced Donald Trump even sillier. Worse, large swaths of the essay were devoted to an illiberal political understanding completely at odds with American constitutionalism. From the overwrought metaphor, we already get a sense of an executive that owes more to Carl Schmitt than Alexander Hamilton. Let forth the forces of illiberalism to save Americaās liberal constitutional order?
Again: This isnāt a treatise. Itās performance art.
The groundlings are in on the act, too. Witness the Trump supporters who play army dress-up at rallies and protests. Their long guns arenāt tools for protection. Theyāre stage props that enable the MAGA-heads to play-act at being saviors of the Republic.
Just a few weeks ago, armed protesters in Michigan gathered at the capitol building in Lansing, protesting Governor Gretchen Whitmerās stay-at-home order. They chanted āLock her up!ā
āLock her upā was originally used by Trump supporters as a rallying cry demanding that Hillary Clinton be sent to prison for various alleged criminal acts. In the case of Whitmer, there were no alleged criminal acts. It was like the cosplay militia were simply staging a revue of Trumpās greatest hitsālike some sad, off, off, off-Broadway jukebox musical.
Others chanted āLet us in!ā and made vague attempts to force their way onto the floor of the state legislature, where Michiganās elected legislators were debating whether or not to extend Governor Whitmerās order.
Ask yourself this: What would these people have done if they had forced their way through the police?
Point their rifles at the legislators and demand repeal of the governorās executive order? Shoot the legislators if they didnāt? Hold the governor hostage?
But of course, the answer is: None of these things. Thatās why they only pretended to try to force their way in and were happy to be turned away. This was nothing more than play-acting as revolutionaries. And why only play-acting? Because these people understand as well as you and I do that they have the right to peacefully protest. They can vote. They can file lawsuits. In other words, they have all of the tools of our constitutional republic available to them in order to get redress for their grievances and they would have had these tools even if they had stayed at home.
The weapons, like the confederate flags and nooses, were all just part of a performance.
Itās curious that Sen. Tom Cotton had nothing to say about the armed Michigan protesters who literally went inside the stateās capitol.
You may recall that Sen. Cotton has been eager to show force against any sign of āinsurrection,ā even going so far to call for the deployment of the military in American cities.
Yet that call only materialized after the men with guns had left the Michigan statehouse. Cottonās call for āno quarterā for protesters was only for the unarmed protesters on the public streets of Washington, D.C.
So we are to believe that Cotton had no fears of an āinsurrectionā against these protesters:

(Scott Olson/Getty Images)
But against these protesters, he wanted to call in the 101st Airborne, offering āno quarterāāthat is, killing rather than taking prisoners.

(Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)
Using American soldiers to kill looters and arsonists would be ridiculous if Cotton had been serious. But he wasnāt. As an aspiring heir to Trumpism, he was merely engaged in a masterful piece of performance art. Though, to be fair to Cotton, his intended audience was not the bourgeoisie, but the Trumpenproletariat, who remain suspicious that he might, after all, not be one of them.
Itās a sad state of affairs where a man like Cottonāgenuinely brave and genuinely smartāmust stage kabuki exhibitions in order to convince his would-be supporters that he is something else.
But this is where we are. Trump has invited a postmodern play into our politics. He doesn't care about values, truth, or justice. Republicans and conservative intellectuals play alongāindeed, the truly virtuous of MAGA world actually egg him on. Even as he encourages extralegal violence.
Our real president who prefers being a pretend president has unleashed a deeply illiberal and undemocratic strand of politics and thinking into the American theater.
And the sophisticates laughed, thinking that it was all a game.
Until people got hurt.