Agreed. Maybe my distinctions aren't the best. I just mean, maybe it's not "Irredeemable, Yes or No?" There is probably a spectrum of some kind. Another person who I think is in Ronna's camp is Sarah Huckabee Sanders, and it looks like she is going to be elected to office. That's the kind of thing I just don't think should happen with these people.
Agreed. Maybe my distinctions aren't the best. I just mean, maybe it's not "Irredeemable, Yes or No?" There is probably a spectrum of some kind. Another person who I think is in Ronna's camp is Sarah Huckabee Sanders, and it looks like she is going to be elected to office. That's the kind of thing I just don't think should happen with these people.
Agreed. And your distinctions are good. But I suggest that a definitive Yes or No standard apply to Irredeemable status, while, for a community forum discussion standpoint, a broader spectrum apply to Beyond-Irredeemable status. I second your recommendation of Sarah-HS for Irredeemable status, and raise that recommendation with Kayleigh Mc.
Kayleigh M. intrigues me. I wonder if she has any conception of the fact that she's been riding the traitor train to work every day. She not only works for Fox, but is part of their brand and marketing campaign....making them look like a station that is actually seeking out the truth.
How can we all look at the same things and see them completely differently? Perhaps she's just all about her career and keeps jumping to the next opportunity and sort of squints her way through the lies and hypocrisy of Trump/GOP/Fox.
I was arguing with a Fox viewer who was claiming that long gone were the Walter Cronkites of the MSM. LOL...as if Walter Cronkite would ever be a Fox news guy. He would have been fired or quit within a short timeframe.
Kayleigh is a smart person. Kayleigh has knowingly and willfully been a conductor on the grift train since the track started its build with the golden escalator ride in 2015. Kayleigh is no fool. It's simply a matter of self-interest / personal gain.
With respect to Walter Cronkite, Fox would never hire Walter Cronkite. Because ratings. It's all about ratings, revenue, and grift.
Agreed. Maybe my distinctions aren't the best. I just mean, maybe it's not "Irredeemable, Yes or No?" There is probably a spectrum of some kind. Another person who I think is in Ronna's camp is Sarah Huckabee Sanders, and it looks like she is going to be elected to office. That's the kind of thing I just don't think should happen with these people.
Agreed. And your distinctions are good. But I suggest that a definitive Yes or No standard apply to Irredeemable status, while, for a community forum discussion standpoint, a broader spectrum apply to Beyond-Irredeemable status. I second your recommendation of Sarah-HS for Irredeemable status, and raise that recommendation with Kayleigh Mc.
Kayleigh M. intrigues me. I wonder if she has any conception of the fact that she's been riding the traitor train to work every day. She not only works for Fox, but is part of their brand and marketing campaign....making them look like a station that is actually seeking out the truth.
How can we all look at the same things and see them completely differently? Perhaps she's just all about her career and keeps jumping to the next opportunity and sort of squints her way through the lies and hypocrisy of Trump/GOP/Fox.
I was arguing with a Fox viewer who was claiming that long gone were the Walter Cronkites of the MSM. LOL...as if Walter Cronkite would ever be a Fox news guy. He would have been fired or quit within a short timeframe.
Kayleigh is a smart person. Kayleigh has knowingly and willfully been a conductor on the grift train since the track started its build with the golden escalator ride in 2015. Kayleigh is no fool. It's simply a matter of self-interest / personal gain.
With respect to Walter Cronkite, Fox would never hire Walter Cronkite. Because ratings. It's all about ratings, revenue, and grift.