
In High-Speed Power Grab, Trump Seeks to Remake the Federal Government
Bending and breaking the law to fire and disempower bureaucrats.

THE SHEER SPEED AND HUGE NUMBER of actions taken by the Trump administration in its first week has left journalists and commentators breathless and bewildered. Itās as if Trump has dumped the pieces of the worldās biggest jigsaw puzzle across the streets of Washington: Everyone is chasing around the individual pieces, while only the Trump team has a sense of how all the pieces fit together.
So while journalists and commentators are looking at the administrationās freeze on all federal grants, including medical research funds; shutdown of communication from scientific and public health agencies; firing of inspectors general; purging of DEI activities and personnel from the government and universities; and launch of migrant deportations, the Trump team already knows what they want it to look likeātheyāve seen the picture on the outside of the box.
Of course, this isnāt Trumpās handiwork; there is no evidence that he has thought deeply about the policy, law, or constitutional questions at stake. But people who work for him have planned on his behalf over the last four years out of power. Among these is Russell Vought, Trumpās nominee to head the Office of Management and Budget, who founded one of several MAGA-friendly think tanks in Washington, the Center for Renewing America, and who contributed to Project 2025. Vought is a zealot among zealots, as his perfervid contribution to Project 2025 makes clear: āNothing less than the survival of self-governance in America is at stake.ā
Still, itās possible to begin to see how the puzzle is coming together, the larger ambitions behind Trumpās actions, and what they mean in the context of our constitutional system. So letās take a closer look at a few of his actions and how they have been executed.
First, consider the dismantling of the federal governmentās DEI programs, which Trump ordered on January 21. The administration concluded that the easiest way was to rid the government of the federal officials working on DEI, but federal civil service rules prohibit simply firing people.
So, late on January 20, the acting director of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)āessentially the federal governmentās human resources department, now reportedly stuffed with Elon Musk loyalistsāsent out a memo to federal department heads with instructions on how to put federal employees on paid leave and squeeze them out of the action. Thatās something that very few people normally would pay attention to.
But then, on January 22, the administration announced that it was shutting down federal DEI operations and laying off all the employees connected with DEI. The expansive interpretation of the governmentās paid-leave policy gave the Trumpistas just the power they needed.
So the administration laid the foundation by creating a reduction-in-force process that didnāt previously exist, and then promptly used it to kill DEI.
Then thereās DOGE, the Elon Musk-led āDepartment of Government Efficiencyā (technically now the āDOGE Serviceā), which Trump ordered to dispatch teams into every federal agency. Where could it quickly recruit a small army of loyalists? OPM took the standard memo thatās sent to agencies with every presidential transition about getting help from short-term political appointees, and then made a crucial change: It lifted the caps usually in place to limit the number of such appointees and permitted the Trump team to flood the bureaucracy with an unlimited number of political appointees. So DOGE launched on the heels of a plan to mold government in MAGAās image and likeness.
More: After Trumpās first four years in office, his team was deeply suspicious of the permanent bureaucracy, especially the members of the Senior Executive Service, a cadre of about 8,000 of the governmentās most experienced managers. So the administration distributed a memo on January 20 asserting that because āofficials wield significant governmental authority, they must serve at the pleasure of the President.ā
With those 14 words, the administration blew up 140 years of consensus, across the political parties, about the need for a technically expert, politically accountable civil service. SES members became, in the presidentās view, at-will employees without civil service protection, who could be fired for any reason. Promptly following Trumpās inauguration, his administration started using the power it had asserted. And in case anyone missed the point, a memo from OPM on January 27 said that anyone involved in shaping policy is ārequired to faithfully implement administration policies to the best of their ability, consistent with their constitutional oath and the vesting of executive authority solely in the President.ā That is, the president has sole power to determine who does what in the executive branch. And then: āFailure to do so is grounds for dismissal.ā
Finally, there is the email reportedly sent from OPM to every federal worker tonightāreading very much like a memo drafted by Musk and his hiresāpurporting to offer them what amounts to a buyout. Details about this ādeferred resignation program,ā including about how it would be funded, will likely emerge in the next few days. If even just a fraction of the federal workforce takes the offer, it could represent the biggest rapid remaking of the federal bureaucracy since the Second World War. And those departed federal workers would likely be replaced by new hires who feel loyalty to Donald Trump.
YOU MAY SEE ARTICLES arguing that one action or another action taken by Trump resembles something that a previous administration did. That totally, completely misses whatās happening. The Trump restoration is simply unlike anything that weāve ever seen before.
Itās singularly, startlingly focused on increasing the presidentās power, by its reading of Article II of the Constitution and the most far-reaching implementation of the āunitary executiveā theory thatās become popular in conservative legal circles over the last forty years. And (to mix metaphors) itās operating from a playbook that none of us knows, to make the pieces come together into a picture that the rest of us can only imagine.
Itās a powerful strategy, designed not only to boost Trumpās policy plans but also to transform governance. Itās happening with a speed intended to overwhelm lawmakers, watchdog groups, journalists, and the public. Careful vigilance and swift action in the courts are called forābefore itās too late.