Thank you! Great article. It made me subscribe e to Bulwark after a year or two of free content. The question I have is this: if you can see it and understand it and I can see it and understand it, why hasn't the DOJ seen it and understood it? Or the FBI? Or the Domestic Terrorism group (I think we have one)?
Thank you! Great article. It made me subscribe e to Bulwark after a year or two of free content. The question I have is this: if you can see it and understand it and I can see it and understand it, why hasn't the DOJ seen it and understood it? Or the FBI? Or the Domestic Terrorism group (I think we have one)?
I too find it deeply disturbing that none of these signers is currently in handcuffs, preferably all of them, along with their congressional counterparts inciting and continuing the turnover of the American Republic. I fear Democrats are not just polite and clueless but also completely spineless (with very few exceptions -- how do we get Pelosi and Cheney in charge?). You would think there had not been any election last year, given who is running things.
Thank you! Great article. It made me subscribe e to Bulwark after a year or two of free content. The question I have is this: if you can see it and understand it and I can see it and understand it, why hasn't the DOJ seen it and understood it? Or the FBI? Or the Domestic Terrorism group (I think we have one)?
I too find it deeply disturbing that none of these signers is currently in handcuffs, preferably all of them, along with their congressional counterparts inciting and continuing the turnover of the American Republic. I fear Democrats are not just polite and clueless but also completely spineless (with very few exceptions -- how do we get Pelosi and Cheney in charge?). You would think there had not been any election last year, given who is running things.
This, however, is the DOJ which is not suppose to be political, or the FBI. But I do agree with you that the Dems are too damned polite.