You want to get into semantics that 48% of the electorate will vote for him instead of half the country, fine. But the idea that y statement was in any way a generalization of the ant group of people besides is voters is a failure of reading comprehension on your part.
You want to get into semantics that 48% of the electorate will vote for him instead of half the country, fine. But the idea that y statement was in any way a generalization of the ant group of people besides is voters is a failure of reading comprehension on your part.
No, you intentionally misrepresented what I said and accused me of generalizing. Your reading comprehension problems are yours alone. Next time, feel free to keep scrolling, your comment won’t be missed.
You want to get into semantics that 48% of the electorate will vote for him instead of half the country, fine. But the idea that y statement was in any way a generalization of the ant group of people besides is voters is a failure of reading comprehension on your part.
I have no need to continue a discourse with someone who feels insulting the other party is part of the game. End.
No, you intentionally misrepresented what I said and accused me of generalizing. Your reading comprehension problems are yours alone. Next time, feel free to keep scrolling, your comment won’t be missed.