I love that the EO uses the well-established threshold of "common sense"...which, of course, works open to interpretation of the final arbiter, be it the public, the courts, or DJT. One supposes that, provided it serves the greater narrative and optics, it is the perfect sense and the obvious choice...at least for the time being.
I love that the EO uses the well-established threshold of "common sense"...which, of course, works open to interpretation of the final arbiter, be it the public, the courts, or DJT. One supposes that, provided it serves the greater narrative and optics, it is the perfect sense and the obvious choice...at least for the time being.
I love that the EO uses the well-established threshold of "common sense"...which, of course, works open to interpretation of the final arbiter, be it the public, the courts, or DJT. One supposes that, provided it serves the greater narrative and optics, it is the perfect sense and the obvious choice...at least for the time being.