No kidding. Listening to Trump blame Signal as being defective or whatever was insane. ('We'll be looking into it.') In what world does that make even the slightest degree of sense? A reporter could have asked "what defect could Signal possess that it would add a number of an Atlantic reporter onto a text chain out of nowhere, especially…
No kidding. Listening to Trump blame Signal as being defective or whatever was insane. ('We'll be looking into it.') In what world does that make even the slightest degree of sense? A reporter could have asked "what defect could Signal possess that it would add a number of an Atlantic reporter onto a text chain out of nowhere, especially when Mike Waltz said he'd never spoken to Goldberg. And if Signal is so defective, aren't you being terribly irresponsible by using it as a communications tool?"
Of course, the biggest elephant in the world will fly before a reporter asks Trump a reasonable follow-up question.
No kidding. Listening to Trump blame Signal as being defective or whatever was insane. ('We'll be looking into it.') In what world does that make even the slightest degree of sense? A reporter could have asked "what defect could Signal possess that it would add a number of an Atlantic reporter onto a text chain out of nowhere, especially when Mike Waltz said he'd never spoken to Goldberg. And if Signal is so defective, aren't you being terribly irresponsible by using it as a communications tool?"
Of course, the biggest elephant in the world will fly before a reporter asks Trump a reasonable follow-up question.