
The Sanders Campaign Is a Menace to Public Health
Bernie Sanders can't beat Joe Biden. But he can force millions of people to risk being exposed to the coronavirus.
On Tuesday night Bernie Sanders lost three more states, all of them large. In Arizona he was on track to lose by double-digits. In Illinois he was defeated by more than 20 points. In Florida his deficit was double that. He received barely 20 percent and lost every single county.
Floridaāyou may have heard this beforeāis an electoral hinge in which every winning Democratic presidential campaign of the last 50 years has been at least competitive.
So Bernieās campaign is over. It has been over since Super Tuesday. And yet, he persists.
A vanity campaign that continues onward despite having no path to victory aside from the other guy dropping dead is usually a nuisance. For example, Jerry Brown in 1992. Ron Paul in 2012. Sometimes, if the candidate and his supporters are particularly aggressive and unpleasant, it can be a hindrance that exacerbates intra-party divisions and does active harm to the partyās nominee. For example, Ted Kennedy in 1980.
But in continuing his campaign today, the Sanders 2020 campaign has become something entirely new in modern politics: A threat to publicāand civicāhealth.
And if he does not suspend his campaign, immediately, then he and his supporters should be shamed and shunned.
The first part of this equation is understanding exactly how thoroughly defeated Sanders is.
Joe Biden has beaten him in every type of state, from Washington to Mississippi, from Minnesota to Massachusetts. From Texas to Virginia to Idaho.
Joe Biden has beaten Sanders among nearly every demographic other than āpeople under 35ā: black, white, college-educated, non-college, urban, rural, suburban, professional, blue-collar.
Joe Biden has won in most places by wide marginsāhis average margin of victory over the last nine contests has been close to 20 points.
But Joe Biden has not yet reached the 1,991 delegate threshold required to mathematically clinch the nomination. And since delegates are being awarded proportionally, he might not cross that line until the end of Aprilāand even this assumes that the votes are held roughly as scheduled.
As a theoretical matter, Sanders can keep campaigning until then by claiming that the race has not yet been decided. But it has. Even if Biden were hit by a bus tomorrow, his lead is substantial enough that heād probably still wind up with more delegates at the end of the campaign than Sanders.
In a normal time, if Bernie Sanders wanted to stay in the race until he was mathematically eliminated, that would be his prerogative.
Heck, if he stayed in the race even after he was mathematically eliminatedāsay, because he wanted to keep his issues alive, or because he wanted to let all Democrats have their votes countedāthat would be fine, too.
And if Sanders wanted to go on a scorched-earth campaign against Biden designed to make him radioactive for the general electionāpurely out of spite? No problem. Allās fair.
But this is not a normal time. We are in the midst of a global pandemic. America is adopting desperate measuresālike voluntary quarantines and the elimination of communal events and gatheringsāto slow the infection rate of COVID-19. Many of these measures are hurting the broader economy and will create societal pain down the road even if they work.
Voting is a communal activity.
In order to have an election, a bunch of volunteersāmost of them well over the age of 35āget together in a firehouse or a school cafeteria. They then interact with a steady stream of people at close range for a day. These people hand objects to the volunteers (driver licenses, voting ID cards) and are then handed other objects (ballots or forms) in return. They stand within armās length of one another. And if the turnout is heavy, the voters stand in a line, waiting as a group.
Maybe this isnāt the Dulles airport petri dish, but it isnāt best-practices, either.
Could you and 30 other people manage voting interactions without engaging in risky behaviors? Sure. But when you scale the number of interactions out to a couple million peopleāwhich is roughly how many Democrats voted on Tuesdayāthere are going to be moments of incidental contact and carelessness.
And if you scale it out to several million more votersāwhich is the number of people who will have to go to the polls in order to formally lock down the nomination? The entire process is simply daring the coronavirus to propagate.
This would be a risk worth taking if we were talking about a real election with real implications for the future. Our democracy is precious and we should not allow it to be overrun by emergencies.
But that is not what is happening at this moment. Any Democratic primaries being held from this point on are merely formalities made necessary by Sandersās refusal to bow to reality and drop out of a race that is already decided.
He has created a public health risk for no good reason. Shame on him. And shame on his supporters for not demanding that he pack it in for the good of the country.
Thatās the public-health side of things. Thereās a civic-health side, too.
Over the last 72 hours, the state of Ohio saw a legal crisis related to its primary. The Ohio Democratic primary was originally scheduled for Tuesday.
On Monday morning, Ohio governor Mike DeWine asked a state court to move the primary to June because of health concerns. The judge denied the request, saying it would create a āterrible precedent.ā So the primary was moving forward.
Late Monday night, DeWine tweeted that he intended to ignore the courtās ruling and that he believed the director of the stateās health department would order the polls closed by fiat.
This created a dangerous situation. Okay, itās not really dangerous in the immediate senseāthe Ohio primary didnāt matter because it was just going to be another blowout Biden victory.
But it does matter that weāre now moving into territory where incumbent executives believe that they can ignore a court order and do whatever they see fit regarding the rescheduling of an election.
It does not take a great deal of imagination to see how a scenario very much like this one might anticipate a constitutional crisis eight months from now.
In the case of Ohio, the state Supreme Court bailed out the governor: Early Tuesday morning, not long before polls were to open, the court issued an unsigned ruling essentially blessing DeWineās power grab. Which, all things considered, was probably for the best. Because the alternative would have been ruling against the governor after he had actedāthus proving that the judiciary is ultimately powerless against a highly motivated chief executive.
Which is . . . not a great precedent.
If America is very lucky, we will not add a constitutional crisis to our health crisis and our economic crisis.
But by continuing his dead-end campaign, Bernie Sanders gave us a little preview of what the weeks ahead might look like. If he continues to persist, there may be more instances where governors show that they can do what they will with the timing of elections, the courts be damned. Instances thatāI promise youāthe biggest chief executive of them all will be watching.
Thereās no shame in losing a campaign. There is a great deal of shame in what Bernie Sanders is doing right now. He is harming America. He should stop.
Today.