63 Comments

Can't imagine what Ben is going thru re Ukraine.

Loved the discussion starting at 27:09. Loved how Ben's "not" getting in the middle of JVL and Sarah's ongoing argument about the voters - haha. JVL and Ben are right. This is who the U.S. now is. I could even argue it's who the country has been for a very long time; it's just that T gave people permission to show their true colors.

Expand full comment

My wife and I have this discussion/disagreement all the time. We are both never Trumpers, but she feels Trump just revealed who people already were, I think Trump led them into a negative direction. She also believes her perspective being from a family Mexican immigrants gives her a different point of view.

Expand full comment

I think both are true: this is who a large % of the country has always been, AND he encourages people to be their worst selves.

Expand full comment

I can easily imagine what Ben is going through re Ukraine because I'm going through it too. Putin is trying to reverse the historical verdict of our glorious victory over communism, and useful idiot Trump is helping him. I played a small role in our victory in the Cold War, and I take this personally. I am also an Orthodox Christian watching my religion be subverted by an antichrist.

Expand full comment

Some days I wonder how many more times my heart can break - for others, not me personally - before there's nothing left to break. So sorry for the shock, betrayal, abandonment, etc. that millions here and around the world are experiencing right now b/c of the (to use JVL's label) wicked U.S voters.

As for the religious aspect, I've been anti-religion for decades b/c of the despicable church I was raised in; but for sincere people like you this has got to be beyond belief. The hypocrisy is truly off the charts. I see pick-ups around where I live w/ stickers in the back window of three crosses, and bumper stickers that say, "God, guns, and Trump." Wherever the soul of Jesus is these days, it would be fascinating to have a conversation w/ him about the atrocities being committed in his name. Hopefully you're familiar w/ Tim Alberta; I think of him often. His second book is one among many that has brought me solace in the sense of knowing there are still really good people out there who see the truth and aren't afraid to speak it.

Best to you and thank you for your service.

Expand full comment

I'm an Atlantic subscriber, so I'm familiar with Tim Alberta - and with Peter Wehner, as well. But my favorite is Tom Nichols, a fellow Eastern Orthodox Christian and Russia expert.

Just to be clear, the antichrist I was referring to was Putin, though I think the label probably fits Trump as well. Under Putin, the Russian Orthodox Church is working as closely with the FSB as it did with the KGB under the Soviets. In Russian-controlled areas of Ukraine, churches of the OCU are closed and their clergy arrested or worse. The Moscow Patriarchate is also at work around the world, stirring up the laity against their bishops, starting schismatic churches, and posing as "conservative" defenders of a fundamentalist (and non-traditional) interpretation of Orthodoxy. Victory in Ukraine would embolden the Russians to continue their worldwide troublemaking.

Ukrainians are literally ten times as religious as Russians. Russia cannot produce enough priests to staff its churches, so it has always imported priests from Ukraine. But Ukrainians no longer want to serve in Russia. Thus, Russia's war against Ukraine can only damage what survives of Russian Orthodox spirituality.

In American Orthodoxy, we are currently experiencing an overwhelming wave of inquirers. My old parish, which typically has 150 at Liturgy on Sunday, currently has around 50 inquirers and catechumens. Three years ago, in the wake of Covid, we had a lot of alt-right types visiting our churches, but now we seem to be getting people looking for spirituality, not politics. Since most of our bishops come from overseas, they tend not to be not deeply enmeshed in American politics.

Expand full comment

Tom is one of my absolute favorite people in the world; they don't get any better IMO. I don't watch Charlie since he left TB; but Tom was on w/ him a couple of days ago and I'm halfway thru it. I don't know of anyone else w/ his combo of 100% accurate moral compass, brilliance, and kindness. Truth be told tho, he hooked me when he wrote the Atlantic article about how Carla saved him.

Sounds like your spiritual community is headed in a positive direction, which is heartening.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Feb 24
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I did a quick search. Tim did a podcast episode with Russell Moore about a month ago, and he has give some public lectures. His bios always describe him as a writer for The Atlantic, in the present tense. Maybe he's doing research for something big - e.g., another book or a cover article.

His latest Atlantic article was published on November 2.

Expand full comment

I rarely hear his name any more, and have wondered about him many times. I hope he didn't just get entirely dispirited.

Expand full comment

◦ Farmers in Kansas are so sorry they voted for trump. The orange POS has made these proud people welfare farmers.

◦ This is what happens when you (MAGA) elect a criminal.

◦ Next to close: The Department of Education. Trump wants you poor and stupid. People are more easily led if they are poor and stupid.

◦ When medicaid and social security are gone, maybe (MAGA) will wake up to the theft.

Expand full comment

I'm looking forward to the Escalation Podcast.

Expand full comment

It takes time for legal challenges to DOGE malfeasances to be completely adjudicated - up to SCOTUS. In the meantime, all staffers in the affected agencies who have been removed and those NGOs whose funding has been ended will not be available for reconstitution.

Expand full comment

Excellent discussion! Looking forward to the next episode.

Expand full comment

Having Wittes explain things so plainly and with expertise is calming. Thank you for having him on alongside JVL, my favorite catastrophizer!

Expand full comment

To watch the "Escalation" event at the Brookings Institution live on February 24, here is the link:

https://www.brookings.edu/events/trumps-return-and-the-fate-of-ukraine/

Expand full comment

JVL is one of my favorite Bulwark opinion leaders, especially with Sarah and Tim, and I always appreciate Ben Wittes's legal analysis. I am also a staunch advocate of the rule of law. However, my main fear after listening to this podcast is that the amount of time from now until the courts intervene to hold Musk/Trump accountable for the lawlessness (including possibly defying court orders) will allow not only for the destruction to be done and possibly be irreversible, but that by that time nobody (the public at large, voters) will care - too procedural, too many technical details, short memories. Simply: It will leave ample time for them to boil the frog.

Expand full comment

I feel the same. I realized today that I was wise to not become a lawyer (a thought I had once). I would have nowhere near the patience for the process that it would appear you have to have. I realize that's what makes the law a check. I am just worried in this instance that, as you say, it will be way, way too late. :/

Expand full comment

Very interesting and informative!! Sound could do with improving though

Expand full comment

While I am absolutely sure that Trump has never read a line of Shakespeare, I am pretty sure that some of the evil cabal directing him have. “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers” (“Henry VI, Part 2”).

Expand full comment

Excellent. Two of my favorite whiz kids.

Expand full comment

Although I definitely can see Ben's point about what this CIty Bank take back might portend, I have a different thought. What if the point of waiting for the funds to be dispersed and then called back is the legal question? Since the funds have been dispersed, Congresses' Constitutional obligations have been met, and if the Executive wants to call it back, oh well, too bad, so sad. I can think of more than two SCOTUS justices who will bite at that worm.

Expand full comment

Minor correction: Disbursed, not dispersed.

Expand full comment

I disagree that impeachment is broken. It's the Senate that is broken because the Senators failed to vote to impeach and instead voted fir party and self interest over the law and country. as far as Clinton is concerned, I'd hardly compare his lack of morals and abuse of the office to take advantage of Ms Lewinsky with the outright corruption and abandonment of the country and his duty by Trump. I just don't see it. I don't sppyof it and he should have been disciplined but impeachment for his lack of morals is a bit much. I sense others may feel differently simply out of dislike of Clinton and his policies....

No, the system is being failed by the Senate.

Expand full comment

Clinton was impeached for lying about what he did (not technically for what he did). He was under oath, and he lied. This one lies every breath and doesn’t believe in any oath save a loyalty oath to him

Expand full comment

I came here to say exactly this. I will add that Impeachment is still an option, but seems less likely to result in removal from office unless the Senate is controlled by the other Party. Or the violation is so egregious… (but wait a violent insurrection didn’t meet that so not sure what it would take…)

Expand full comment

Does the president's pardon power extend to findings of/punishments for civil and criminal contempt? I assume so but maybe there is some separation of powers argument to run? And are there any state actions that can be taken in this context of a president acting beyond his power?

Expand full comment

Civil contempt is not a crime, and can't be pardoned.

Expand full comment

Great guest; knowledgeable, well-spoken, honest and very likable! Thanks for sharing with us, Ben!!

Expand full comment

Agree! I do not want to dis anyone but I find Ben much preferable to George Conway.

Ben doesn't bloviate, he explains legal issues thoroughly and he doesn't grandstand nor interrupt his interlocutor. Would like to see much more of Ben!

Expand full comment

So interesting to hear the intricate arguments on the interpretation of clauses in the constitution. I feel like I was in a law class! Thanks, Ben

Expand full comment